From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Sun Apr  6 16:10:04 2014
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 4F1D2358687; Sun,  6 Apr 2014 16:10:04 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 3622 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Sun, 06 Apr 2014 16:10:03 CEST
Received: from st11p02mm-asmtp001.mac.com (st11p02mm-asmtp001.mac.com [17.172.220.236])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0C035690D
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Sun,  6 Apr 2014 16:10:01 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Received: from [10.0.1.4] (c-24-9-79-217.hsd1.co.comcast.net [24.9.79.217])
 by st11p02mm-asmtp001.mac.com
 (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug
 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0N3M000PO1UYLG90@st11p02mm-asmtp001.mac.com> for
 sc22wg5@open-std.org; Sun, 06 Apr 2014 13:09:04 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5213) WG23 for extinction ...
From: Dan Nagle <danlnagle@me.com>
In-reply-to: <20140405113440.8329C3586A2@www.open-std.org>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 07:08:57 -0600
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <6524A704-27D8-4CC8-8B19-4A12E8E048B1@me.com>
References: <20140405113440.8329C3586A2@www.open-std.org>
To: WG5 List <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-MANTSH: 1TEIXWV4bG1oaGkdHB0lGUkdDRl5PWBoaGREKTEMXGx0EGx0YBBIZBBsTEBseGh8
	aEQpYTRdLEQptfhcaEQpMWRcbGhsbEQpZSRcRClleF2hueREKQ04XSxseGmJCH2lvHlAcGXhzB
	xkcGxkaElIfEQpYXBcZBBoEHQdNSx0SSEkcTAUbHQQbHRgEEhkEGxMQGx4aHxsRCl5ZF2FOXEt
	tEQpMRhdia2sRCkNaFxgeBBMEHRMEGBsdEQpCRRdiRVBfenASeHJlRxEKQk4XbHBgeUAdYlJpG
	mIRCkJMF2RCTkkbaE9OHG16EQpCbBdkZH54axloe1pDUhEKQkAXY2sbaR98GUh7XVwRCkJYF2h
	TRxoTbBlNf2l+EQpwZxdlAWZSHXxkUl1pYBEKcGgXYBtfT0Z+UGRfTGsRCnBoF2doXUxcUE16S
	ElpEQpwaBdvRlt+ehpoXnxtGBEKcGgXZkAFax1JbhkfUHARCnBoF2RmUnxbeE9eaF96EQpwfxd
	pQ04ZQU8FTB1vQhEKcF8XekNgY0NuRnJkBXMRCnBfF2J7TGtOY24BRht4EQpwfxdpZ1NmHk4eZ
	ltBHxEKcF8Xb2xOHmkSc0kFEm8RCnBnF2BmfnldHWhuYklpEQpwfxdpBRNic3BlRQFFQxEKcF8
	XYRxhT3tLaVNHHB8RCnBsF2BIf0tJUEkSUn1dEQpwTBdpG31aWUJ7RHJ7XBE=
X-CLX-Spam: false
X-CLX-Score: 1011
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure
 engine=2.50.10432:5.11.87,1.0.14,0.0.0000
 definitions=2014-04-06_01:2014-04-04,2014-04-06,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0
 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1404060096
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

Since WG23 has not yet published the revision of their TS
with the Fortran Annex, it=92s premature to disband them.
See J3/14-131r1 for more.

After the next revision of 24772 is published, you may have
other views.

On Apr 5, 2014, at 05:10 , Toon Moene <toon@moene.org> wrote:

> I just got the following message on the mailing list for the Dutch=20
> Programming Lanuages Committee:
>=20
> Livelink action: added - 2014-04-01
> ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22/N4912/MISC
> Ter goedkeuring                         reactie gevraagd voor: =
2014-06-17
> U.S. Request for Ballot on Disbandment of SC 22/WG 23, Vulnerabilities
>=20
> I.e., whether we are OK with disbanding WG23 (reaction before 17th of=20=

> June 2014).
>=20
> How should I advise to vote ?
>=20
> --=20
> Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
> Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
> At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
> Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3@mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3

--

Cheers!
Dan Nagle






