From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Wed Mar 26 10:34:26 2014
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id A27D93585F9; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:34:26 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.142])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A5D3585C9
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:34:25 +0100 (CET)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:46104)
	by ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25)
	with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1WSkE4-0004ZS-89 (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623)
	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:34:24 +0000
Received: from prayer by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk)
	with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1WSkE4-0002GC-Fo (Exim 4.72)
	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:34:24 +0000
Received: from [91.125.220.221] by old-webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk
	with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.5); 26 Mar 2014 09:34:24 +0000
Date: 26 Mar 2014 09:34:24 +0000
From: "N.M. Maclaren" <nmm1@cam.ac.uk>
To: sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5206) New types from old
Message-ID: <Prayer.1.3.5.1403260934240.6429@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20140326020651.4C027358603@www.open-std.org>
References: <20140326020651.4C027358603@www.open-std.org>
X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mar 26 2014, Van Snyder wrote:
>
> ...

Interesting.  I thought of specifying a generic interface, but realised
that it wouldn't fly, for the same reason that the existing specification
introduces a gotcha (Collectives.2 in my comments).

Your ideas may be too radical, but would tackle the problem.  They need
at least considering.

Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

