From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Mar 25 11:10:10 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 5C50835862E; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:10:10 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net (out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net [62.24.202.76]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F002F358385 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:10:08 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAI1VMVMCYXO3/2dsb2JhbAANTMcBgTaDGQEBAQQ4GyURCxgJFg8JAwIBAgFFBg0IArM/nF2GWxeOBxEBV4Q4BJhNlV+Bcg X-IPAS-Result: ApMBAI1VMVMCYXO3/2dsb2JhbAANTMcBgTaDGQEBAQQ4GyURCxgJFg8JAwIBAgFFBg0IArM/nF2GWxeOBxEBV4Q4BJhNlV+Bcg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,728,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="112057373" Received: from host-2-97-115-183.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([2.97.115.183]) by out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2014 10:10:07 +0000 Message-ID: <53315601.6010006@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:10:09 +0000 From: John Reid User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/28.0 SeaMonkey/2.25 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "sc22wg5@open-std.org" Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5197) [ukfortran] Ballot on draft DTS References: <20140312154430.1B7899EB083@www.open-std.org> <20140324133031.CC99D35856F@www.open-std.org> <20140324160849.220FA356F90@www.open-std.org> <20140324204821.77D8535872E@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20140324204821.77D8535872E@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk N.M. Maclaren wrote: > On Mar 24 2014, Bill Long wrote: >>> >>> Events.2) This TS introduces a facility that is arguably in conflict >>> with Fortran 2008 page 23:1-2, and is not described as processor >> >> 23:1 is a subclause title. 23:2 is the following text: >> >> In descriptive text, an equivalent English word is frequently used in >> place of a syntactic term. Particular state- >> >> I'm having trouble understanding how this is relevant. > > Mea culpa. Brain failure due to overload. Fortran 2008 1.5 paragraph 1. > Having a defined interpretation according to the standard. Nick, I have kept a copy of your email as your vote in the ballot and will copy it mechanically to the N document that gives the result of the ballot. If you find any errors, please send in a new replacement version. Thanks, John.