From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Wed Feb 19 15:03:24 2014
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id BAAE4358419; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:03:24 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 1239 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:03:24 CET
Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683CC356D54
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:03:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:40041)
	by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25)
	with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1WG7QC-0005Ww-0f (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) for sc22wg5@open-std.org
	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:42:44 +0000
Received: from prayer by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk)
	with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1WG7QC-0000n7-52 (Exim 4.72) for sc22wg5@open-std.org
	(return-path <nmm1@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:42:44 +0000
Received: from [131.111.56.53] by old-webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk
	with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.5); 19 Feb 2014 13:42:44 +0000
Date: 19 Feb 2014 13:42:44 +0000
From: "N.M. Maclaren" <nmm1@cam.ac.uk>
To: sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: The semantics of atomic actions
Message-ID: <Prayer.1.3.5.1402191342440.1370@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20140211074051.02A0C9DB189@www.open-std.org>
References: <20140211074051.02A0C9DB189@www.open-std.org>
X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

While looking at Peter Sewell's advanced concurrency course, I found this
and am enquiring further.  It looks very plausible as a basis, so I am
posting a link.  People who are not particularly interested need not bother
to look at it, because (at present) it is merely a possibility.

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.42.4886

Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

