From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Mon Dec 23 12:20:36 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id C2733356D11; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 12:20:36 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from nag-j.co.jp (nag-j.co.jp [111.68.142.10]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD42C35692E for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 12:20:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from Rs (p25101-ipngn201funabasi.chiba.ocn.ne.jp [180.14.54.101]) (authenticated bits=0) by nag-j.co.jp (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBNBKPnT080727 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:20:31 GMT (envelope-from malcolm@nag-j.co.jp) Message-ID: From: "Malcolm Cohen" To: "sc22wg5" References: <20131126013542.D88A93582CC@www.open-std.org><20131220171849.090F03582F4@www.open-std.org><20131222004843.861D635835A@www.open-std.org><1387678359.20328.7.camel@van-laptop> <20131222162956.B9CCF3583E4@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20131222162956.B9CCF3583E4@www.open-std.org> Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5163) (j3.2006) [ Draft corrigendum 3] Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 20:20:23 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Bill Long writes: >I would not be opposed to moving most of 5.4 into the obsolescent column. Perhaps, but noone has proposed it either. Doing so would not be serving the user or vendor communities. I would dispute that the alternatives are "better" in any meaningful sense. But since that idea is not going to be proposed for the next revision, I will stop there. Cheers, -- ............................Malcolm Cohen, NAG.