From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Fri Dec 20 18:18:48 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id EAE6C3582EB; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:18:48 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from exprod6og118.obsmtp.com (exprod6og118.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.233]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FEA43582D0 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:18:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from CFWEX01.americas.cray.com ([136.162.34.11]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob118.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUrR79TMxqrfH+ADeTrgrCtzFaCnbkvE3@postini.com; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:18:48 PST Received: from fortran.us.cray.com (172.31.19.200) by CFWEX01.americas.cray.com (172.30.88.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:18:15 -0600 Message-ID: <52B47C08.9030202@cray.com> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:19:04 -0600 From: Bill Long Reply-To: Organization: Cray Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sc22wg5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5119) [ Draft corrigendum 3] References: <20131126013542.D88A93582CC@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20131126013542.D88A93582CC@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk > Please answer the following question "Is N1995, with the references and > notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as > Corrigendum 3 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways. > > 1) Yes. > 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. > 3) No, for the following reasons. > 4) Abstain. No. Changes that are NOT the reason for my No vote: ------------------------------------------------------------------ Minor typos in the citations: [24:14] should be [24:13]; [24:15] should be [24:15-16]. Typo in the actual official text: In the instruction line for the edit at [459:17+] remove the space between "2.3.5" and ")". Reason for No vote: --------------------------- I agree with Malcolm's original comment that Interp f08/0086 should be failed and restarted. I'm not happy with the proposed last-minute text file of changes for these reasons: 1) A main reason for having a vote like this is to agree (or not) on the exact form of the PDF file form of the Corrigendum - this is basically an "FCD" vote. That purpose is subverted here because the proposers of this path have not supplied the PDF form of their replacements. 2) Another goal of a final vote like this is to reflect on whether we have made a technical mistake. The complexity of the changes proposed for f08/0086, and the problems getting them "right" convince me that we chose the wrong answer for the interp. The alternate answer would result in a trivial, single edit in the standard, and would prohibit only code like that in the interp example that is confusing at best and would never be allowed by any reasonable coding style guide. The place to have this discussion is in the process of restarting the interp. I would change my vote to YES if the minor corrections above are made and the edits for f08/0086 are deleted. Cheers, Bill -- Bill Long longb@cray.com Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024 Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142 Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101