From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Fri Dec 20 17:28:49 2013
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id F39E93582D9; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:28:48 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814403582A2
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:28:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23])
  by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2013 08:28:45 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,521,1384329600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="447666305"
Received: from orsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.128])
  by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2013 08:28:45 -0800
Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.114]) by
 ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.8.94]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003;
 Fri, 20 Dec 2013 08:28:44 -0800
From: "Whitlock, Stan" <stan.whitlock@intel.com>
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
CC: "Whitlock, Stan" <stan.whitlock@intel.com>
Subject: RE: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5117) Draft corrigendum 3
Thread-Topic: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5117) Draft corrigendum 3
Thread-Index: Ac79oD7P2yyH0ECHTTGjiW9XSA41hQ==
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:28:43 +0000
Message-ID: <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D35F894B7F@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.138]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

I vote Yes, provided the edits for f08/f0086 from N1987 are replaced by tho=
se from mjc002.txt distributed on 13 December.

Thanks

/Stan Whitlock
 Intel Corp

-----Original Message-----
From: j3-bounces@mailman.j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces@mailman.j3-fortr=
an.org] On Behalf Of John Reid
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 11:33 AM
To: WG5
Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5117) Draft corrigendum 3

WG5,

David Muxworthy has constructed a draft corrigendum 3 from the interps that=
 have been agreed and I have checked it. It is attached, along with a paper=
 for a WG5 vote on it. It is unfortunate that it has come up at the same ti=
me as the vote on the TS. Because of this, I have set the end date to be a =
week after the end date for the TS vote.

Best wishes,

John.

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
                                         ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1998-1
                                                    =20
                 WG5 letter ballot on draft Corrigendum 3

                      John Reid, 9 November 2013

This is a WG5 letter ballot on N1995, the draft Corrigendum 3 for=20
Fortran 2008. It was constructed by David Muxworthy and has been checked
by me. The notes in italics will be removed from the final version, as=20
will the references to interpretation numbers and page and line numbers=20
in the standard.=20

Please answer the following question "Is N1995, with the references and=20
notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as
Corrigendum 3 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways.=20

1) Yes.
2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.=20
3) No, for the following reasons.
4) Abstain.

This is an individual vote. Please send your vote to sc22wg5@open-std.org=20
to arrive by 9 a.m. (UK time) on December 14, 2013.
