From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Thu Dec 19 20:27:38 2013
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id D78B9356B6E; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:27:38 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from moene.org (moene.org [80.101.130.238])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABC5356A58
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:27:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([::1])
	by moene.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82)
	(envelope-from <toon@moene.org>)
	id 1VtjFq-0003BW-4O; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:27:30 +0100
Message-ID: <52B348A2.1030805@moene.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:27:30 +0100
From: Toon Moene <toon@moene.org>
Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131005 Icedove/17.0.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: fortran standards email list for J3 <j3@mailman.j3-fortran.org>
CC: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>, WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5117) Draft corrigendum 3
References: <6DB71825-1BAB-4F03-A20C-26A1690BCA12@bcs.org.uk> <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D35F880C7D@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> <D9965E06-3C21-40E0-84C3-253C71BC6A60@bcs.org.uk> <52795621.20607@stfc.ac.uk> <D8F091A0-A300-4978-A7A4-033D0608439A@bcs.org.uk> <527E0588.3050108@stfc.ac.uk> <527E4555.8040802@stfc.ac.uk> <82850241-D8D5-48ED-830D-E096F0EDEC86@bcs.org.uk> <20131109163305.459B2358294@www.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131109163305.459B2358294@www.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On 11/09/2013 05:32 PM, John Reid wrote:

> WG5,
>
> David Muxworthy has constructed a draft corrigendum 3 from the interps
> that have been agreed and I have checked it. It is attached, along with
> a paper for a WG5 vote on it. It is unfortunate that it has come up at
> the same time as the vote on the TS. Because of this, I have set the end
> date to be a week after the end date for the TS vote.

My vote is yes, after Malcolm's revised edits for F08/0086 are included.

Kind regards,

-- 
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
