From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Sat Dec 14 06:22:45 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id C94D03582F9; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 06:22:45 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 603 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 06:22:45 CET Received: from userp1050.oracle.com (userp1050.oracle.com [156.151.31.82]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506E13582D8 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 06:22:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by userp1050.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id rBE5CgYi010706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 05:12:43 GMT Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id rBE5CckX027456 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 05:12:40 GMT Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBE5CcrC007058 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 05:12:38 GMT Received: from abhmp0011.oracle.com (abhmp0011.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBE5Cc1H007050 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 05:12:38 GMT Received: from [10.132.140.77] (/10.132.140.77) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:12:37 -0800 Message-ID: <52ABE8B5.5060001@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:12:21 -0800 From: Robert Corbett Reply-To: robert.corbett@oracle.com Organization: Oracle America User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS sun4u; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110814 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5117) Draft corrigendum 3 References: <6DB71825-1BAB-4F03-A20C-26A1690BCA12@bcs.org.uk> <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D35F880C7D@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> <52795621.20607@stfc.ac.uk> <527E0588.3050108@stfc.ac.uk> <527E4555.8040802@stfc.ac.uk> <82850241-D8D5-48ED-830D-E096F0EDEC86@bcs.org.uk> <20131109163305.459B2358294@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20131109163305.459B2358294@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81] Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk > Please answer the following question "Is N1995, with the references and > notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as > Corrigendum 3 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways. > 1) Yes. > 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. > 3) No, for the following reasons. > 4) Abstain. My vote is 1) yes. The edits for implied-shape arrays, even as modified, are at best complicated and confusing. My complaint is with the edits not with the corresponding interpretation, which I think is correct. I accept that the latest proposed edits are probably the best we shall get for the Corrigendum. I hope we can do better in the next revision of the standard. As I pointed out in my ballots on the interpretations, the same conditions that led to Subclause 7.1.11 apply not only to the function PRESENT, but also to ALLOCATED and ASSOCIATED. I continue to disagree with the edits proposed for Subclause 14.3, but I accept that I lost the vote in committee and on the subsequent ballots. Robert Corbett representing Oracle America