From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Sat Dec 7 08:08:31 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 1C8053582EE; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 08:08:31 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 1182 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 08:08:30 CET Received: from aserp1050.oracle.com (aserp1050.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BD93582DA for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 08:08:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by aserp1050.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id rB76mnUs015110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 06:48:49 GMT Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id rB76mjPF000444 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 06:48:46 GMT Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rB76mi0H018037 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 06:48:45 GMT Received: from ubhmt109.oracle.com (ubhmt109.oracle.com [156.151.24.14]) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rB76mi1w019024 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 06:48:44 GMT Received: from [10.132.140.77] (/10.132.140.77) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:48:43 -0800 Message-ID: <52A2C4C4.9000001@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:48:36 -0800 From: Robert Corbett Reply-To: robert.corbett@oracle.com Organization: Oracle America User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS sun4u; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110814 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5116) Vote on revised draft DTS References: <20131107223812.7654C3581D9@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20131107223812.7654C3581D9@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69] Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk My vote is 3) No, for the following reasons. I am persuaded by the comments of the who voted earlier that the draft TS is not ready to be forwarded to SC22. In additional to those comments, I have an editorial comment, which by itself would not have caused me to vote no. The second sentence of Clause 3 seems to be out-of-place. The sentence is obviously true, so obviously true that I wondered why it was worth stating. I was told that it was needed to make it clear that the name ISO_FORTRAN_ENV in Clauses 3.3 and 3.4 referred to ISO_FORTRAN_ENV as extended by the TS. Again, I thought that to be obvious, but if it is worth stating, it should be stated explicitly. I suggest deleting the second sentence of Clause 3 and replacing Clauses 3.3 and 3.4 with 3.3 event variable scalar variable of the type EVENT_TYPE(6.2) from the intrinsic module ISO_FORTRAN_ENV as extended by this Technical Specification. 3.4 team variable scalar variable of the type TEAM_TYPE(5.2) from the intrinsic module ISO_FORTRAN_ENV as extended by this Technical Specification. Robert Corbett