From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Tue Nov 26 12:04:18 2013
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 9DE78358225; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:04:18 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net (out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net [62.24.202.76])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DAB356C2A
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:04:03 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAP1zlFJcFbBv/2dsb2JhbAANTMAogUCDGgEBBDgbJRELIRYPCQMCAQIBRQYNCAK1HopZh0eOfYQzA5gUlTk
X-IPAS-Result: ApMBAP1zlFJcFbBv/2dsb2JhbAANTMAogUCDGgEBBDgbJRELIRYPCQMCAQIBRQYNCAK1HopZh0eOfYQzA5gUlTk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,773,1378854000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="73903006"
Received: from host-92-21-176-111.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([92.21.176.111])
  by out.ipsmtp4nec.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2013 11:04:02 +0000
Message-ID: <52948023.8080906@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 11:04:03 +0000
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5119) [ Draft corrigendum 3]
References: <20131126013542.D88A93582CC@www.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131126013542.D88A93582CC@www.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Van Snyder wrote:

> [96:28] says "The rank of an implied-shape array is the number of
> <implied-shape-spec>s in the <implied-shape-spec-list>."  The syntax
> term <implied-shape-spec-list> no longer exists.  This sentence is not
> changed by the corrigendum or interp f08/0086.  The sentence needs to be
> changed to something like "The rank of an implied-shape array is the
> number of asterisks in the <implied-shape-spec>".  If this needs to go
> back through the interp process, my vote must unfortunately be "no".

This looks to me like an obvious oversight that should be corrected in 
the Corrigendum. I will say this in my vote. I would like to encourage 
others in their votes to say whether they agree.

Best wishes,

John.