From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Nov 26 02:35:36 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 320CF3582C9; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 02:35:35 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (mailhost.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.105]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E20E3582C4 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 02:34:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from [137.79.7.57] (math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id rAQ1YYjp004491 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO) for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:34:35 -0800 Subject: [Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5117) Draft corrigendum 3] From: Van Snyder Reply-To: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov To: sc22wg5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Organization: Yes Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:34:47 -0800 Message-ID: <1385429687.14271.83.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 (2.28.3-30.el6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-Sender: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov X-AUTH: Authorized Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1998-1 WG5 letter ballot on draft Corrigendum 3 John Reid, 9 November 2013 This is a WG5 letter ballot on N1995, the draft Corrigendum 3 for Fortran 2008. It was constructed by David Muxworthy and has been checked by me. The notes in italics will be removed from the final version, as will the references to interpretation numbers and page and line numbers in the standard. Please answer the following question "Is N1995, with the references and notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as Corrigendum 3 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways. 1) Yes. 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. 3) No, for the following reasons. 4) Abstain. This is an individual vote. Please send your vote to sc22wg5@open-std.org to arrive by 9 a.m. (UK time) on December 14, 2013. Yes, but: In the edit for [94:10] the "i" in "implied-shape-spec" should be italic instead of upright. [96:28] says "The rank of an implied-shape array is the number of s in the ." The syntax term no longer exists. This sentence is not changed by the corrigendum or interp f08/0086. The sentence needs to be changed to something like "The rank of an implied-shape array is the number of asterisks in the ". If this needs to go back through the interp process, my vote must unfortunately be "no". The edit for [158:19-20] only applies to [158:19]. This doesn't matter for the ISO-published corrigendum, which doesn't have [page:line] references.