From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Aug 20 17:43:33 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 2980435719E; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:43:32 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.tiscali.co.uk [212.74.100.55]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8632356952 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:43:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Trace: 1038073357/mk-filter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$THROTTLED_DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/88.104.254.228/None/d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 88.104.254.228 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk X-SMTP-AUTH: X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM X-MUA: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAFeOE1JYaP7k/2dsb2JhbAANTbA6kyqBOoMZAQEEgQkLRleqFYtXkFwWgwV5A517jl0 X-IPAS-Result: ApMBAFeOE1JYaP7k/2dsb2JhbAANTbA6kyqBOoMZAQEEgQkLRleqFYtXkFwWgwV5A517jl0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,921,1367967600"; d="scan'208";a="1038073357" Received: from 88-104-254-228.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([88.104.254.228]) by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2013 16:43:10 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.5056) WG5 ballots From: David Muxworthy In-Reply-To: <20130804194733.55AAA357194@www.open-std.org> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:43:09 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <20130804194733.55AAA357194@www.open-std.org> To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk The following Fortran 2008 interpretations are being balloted: Yes No Number Title -Y- --- F03/0030 IEEE divide by zero -Y- --- F03/0047 Polymorphic arguments to intrinsic procedures -C- --- F03/0053 The BIND attribute for C_PTR and C_FUNPTR -Y- --- F03/0064 Recursive declaration of procedure interfaces -Y- --- F03/0100 Error in field width for special cases of signed INFINITY output -C- --- F03/0139 Functions returning procedure pointers -Y- --- F08/0071 Vector subscript target -Y- --- F08/0075 Pointer function reference as variable in assignment -Y- --- F08/0076 Pointer function reference in READ Subsumed by F07/0075 -C- --- F08/0083 Type parameter default expressions allow circular dependence -Y- --- F08/0084 Pointer arguments to PURE functions -Y- --- F08/0085 Problems with PARAMETERs -C- --- F08/0086 Implied-shape and separate PARAMETER statement -C- --- F08/0087 Mixed-kind character assignment -Y- --- F08/0088 Can ALLOCATE with SOURCE= have side-effects in a PURE proc? -Y- --- F08/0089 Variable-denoting functions change existing semantics -C- --- F08/0090 What restrictions apply to initialization and PARAMETER? Comments: F03/0053 I prefer the first alternative at [431:6]. F03/0139 For the interp archive: "(1b)" and "(2b)" in the answers and the edits should be "(1)" and "(2)". "result variable" on [307:16-17] appears to have been missed. F08/0083 For consistency the edit should be to 10-007r1. not 12-007. F08/0086 The notes suggest that the edits are not complete. Is another interp being raised to resolve the issue? F08/0087 In the edit at [25:2+] "after p2" should be "after p3". F08/0090 I agree that Answer 1 for program m200c3_1 is strictly correct, but this creates an unfortunate difference from the DATA statement. Admittedly, an array constant is different from an array of constants but Note 5.29 has as an example: DATA ((SKEW (K, J), J = 1, K), K = 1, 100) / 5050 * 0.0 / This, or similar examples, have appeared in each standard since F77. The average user might expect PARAMETER to allow similar flexibility. -------------------------------------------------------------- David