From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Jul 31 14:59:55 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 7008B357085; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:59:55 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from exprod6og104.obsmtp.com (exprod6og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.187]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA50D3569AA for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:59:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from CFWEX01.americas.cray.com ([136.162.34.11]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob104.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUfkKN2oVvhNeCDZdjX317msx737qWVjj@postini.com; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:59:53 PDT Received: from fortran.us.cray.com (172.31.19.200) by CFWEX01.americas.cray.com (172.30.88.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:58:01 -0500 Message-ID: <51F90B47.4030903@cray.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:04:07 -0500 From: Bill Long Reply-To: Organization: Cray Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fortran standards email list for J3 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5050) RE: [ukfortran] ts29113 compiler conformance table References: <20130724235846.299F4357176@www.open-std.org> <51F0DD9B.6040802@net-b.de><20130725222446.98834357194@www.open-std.org> <20130729085936.D199A35717D@www.open-std.org> <20130731062831.84EDC357134@www.open-std.org> <20130731094833.503C535718D@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20130731094833.503C535718D@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Hi Ian, I think this is better, but have some additional suggestions: On 7/31/13 4:49 AM, Ian Chivers wrote: > Here is an attempt based on Malcolm's comments. > > Does this cover everything? > > TS conformant iso_fortran_binding.h > > Assumed shape arguments for BIND(C) Move this to the end to be together with allocatable/pointer arguments... > > CFI_CDESC_T and CFI_establish > > CFI_allocate, CFI_setpointer, CFI_deallocate > > “CFI_section and CFI_select_part” I would simplify this to just 2 entries: CFI_CDESC_T macro CFI_* functions declared in iso_fortran_binding.h {If the implementation does any it would likely do all.} > > ”Assumed rank” > > ”Assumed type” or “TYPE(*)” > > “Pass scalar to TYPE(*) DIMENSION(*)” > > “Non-interoperable array for C_LOC/C_F_POINTER” > > “Non-interoperable function for C_FUNLOC/C_F_PROCPTR” > > ”New semantics for ASYNCHRONOUS attribute” > > “RANK intrinsic function” Add here: "Changes to SHAPE, SIZE, and UBOUND" > > “Allocatable arguments for BIND(C)” > > “Pointer arguments for BIND(C)” For the above 2 (and the assume-shape entry moved here) it would be more clear to add "dummy" before "arguments". And, add another, similar, entry here: "Optional dummy arguments for BIND(C)" Cheers, Bill > > > > _______________________________________________ > J3 mailing list > J3@mailman.j3-fortran.org > http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3 > -- Bill Long longb@cray.com Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024 Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142 Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101