From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed May 29 16:13:30 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 1B964356E98; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:13:29 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 3099 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:13:29 CEST Received: from bulk.mail.timico.net (ndc1-bulk01.mail.timico.net [62.105.160.41]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD60D356E3D for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 16:13:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [62.105.160.40] (helo=relay.mail.timico.net) by bulk.mail.timico.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UhgJq-0004lE-Rc for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:21:34 +0100 Received: from [80.175.48.54] (helo=mail4.ukisp.com) by relay.mail.timico.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UhgJq-00049X-Lz for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:21:34 +0100 Received: (qmail 5741 invoked by uid 399); 29 May 2013 13:21:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO xps435) (86.26.160.183) by mail4.ukisp.com with ESMTPM; 29 May 2013 13:21:34 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 86.26.160.183 From: "Ian Chivers" To: "'fortran standards email list for J3'" , "'WG5'" Cc: "'Bill Long'" References: <20130527194800.755D0356E40@www.open-std.org> <20130528064313.2D3EA356EC9@www.open-std.org> <20130528175553.29F77356E2E@www.open-std.org> <20130528195028.EDA22356E76@www.open-std.org> <20130528215920.3F54A356922@www.open-std.org> <20130529115820.DF87A356E9B@www.open-std.org> <20130529120239.D28BB356EA6@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20130529120239.D28BB356EA6@www.open-std.org> Subject: RE: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5008) AW: AW: AW: Corrections to TS29113 Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 14:21:22 +0100 Message-ID: <001001ce5c6f$70430a10$50c91e30$@chivers@chiversandbryan.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AQHOXGPS5fLNVRKJBU2/Rjfb1xTeupkcDyDwgAAVtuA= Content-Language: en-gb Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk In the light of the publication of ISO/IEC TS 29113:2012 Tobias Burnus notified us about the document and suggested the following entries for inclusion in the compiler conformance table. http://www.fortranplus.co.uk/resources/fortran_2003_2008_compiler_support= .pd f OPTIONAL with BIND(C) Assumed type Assumed rank RANK intrinsic Array descriptor ASYNCHRONOUS changes does anyone have any other suggestions/recommendations cheers Ian chivers and Jane Sleightholme -----Original Message----- From: j3-bounces@mailman.j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces@mailman.j3-fortran.org] On Behalf Of Bader, Reinhold Sent: 29 May 2013 13:02 To: WG5 Cc: Bill Long Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5008) AW: AW: AW: Corrections to TS29113 Hello Bill,=20 OK. I've attached an updated version of the complete draft; in = particular I've also added edits for section (D).=20 Regards Reinhold > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org [mailto:owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org] > Im Auftrag von Bill Long > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Mai 2013 13:58 > An: longb@cray.com; sc22wg5 > Betreff: (SC22WG5.5007) (j3.2006) AW: AW: Corrections to TS29113 >=20 > Arg! Ignore the comments about C535b versus C535c - I was looking at=20 > the wrong document. Reinhold was, of course, right on those. >=20 > Cheers, > Bill >=20 >=20 > On 5/28/13 5:02 PM, Bill Long wrote: > > > > > > On 5/28/13 2:43 PM, Bader, Reinhold wrote: > >> Here a modified version of section (A): > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> -- > >> --------------------------------- > >> (A) Assumed rank entities. > >> > >> The Fortran lower bounds of an assumed-rank dummy argument that > does > >> not have the POINTER or ALLOCATABLE attribute should be one. > >> Furthermore, > >> C532 must be loosened in order to allow assumed-rank entities to=20 > >> have the POINTER or ALLOCATABLE attribute. > >> > >> EDITS: > >> > >> In section 5.2, after C535c, insert > > > > C535b ? 5.2 does not currently have a C535c. > >> > >> "The lower bounds of an assumed-rank entity argument associated = with a > >> non-pointer non-allocatable array are 1 > > > > Better in this subclause. Maybe clearer if "that is" follows = "entity". > > No hyphens in nonpointer or nonallocatable. > > > >> ; its extents are those of its > >> effective argument. > > > > This is already covered in 6.3. > > > >> The size, bounds, and shape of an unallocated allocatable or a > >> disassociated pointer assumed-rank entity are undefined; the > > > > I think this is already true in general. > > > >> size, bounds, and shape of an allocated allocatable or an > >> associated pointer assumed-rank entity are assumed from its > >> effective argument." > > > > This is already covered in 6.3. > > > >> > >> The same text is added at the end of section 9.5, after C535c. > > > > C535b. > > > >> > >> Before the edits for 5.3.8.7 in section 9.5, add > >> > >> "{In 5.3.8.4, change C532 as follows} > >> > >> C532 An array with the POINTER or ALLOCATABLE attribute ~[that is > >> not an assumed rank entity (5.3.8.7)] shall have an = array-spec > >> that is a deferred-shape-spec-list." > > > > I agree this needs to be fixed. Good catch. > > > > Cheers, > > Bill > > > > > >> > >> (the ~[...] text is added and hence gets underwaves). > >> > >> Further comment: For the C descriptor, section 8.3.3 already=20 > >> specifies the lower bound for a non-allocatable non-pointer array = as zero. > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> -- > >> --------------------------------- > > >=20 > -- > Bill Long longb@cray.com > Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024 > Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142 > Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101 >=20