From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Sun Apr 14 14:06:14 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id DAA2335689D; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 14:06:13 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from moene.org (moene.org [82.95.66.103]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EC235689D for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 14:06:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] by moene.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1URLh3-0004NN-QA; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 14:06:01 +0200 Message-ID: <516A9BA9.1010807@moene.org> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 14:06:01 +0200 From: Toon Moene Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fortran standards email list for J3 CC: "Whitlock, Stan" , WG5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4930) J3/13-xxxr1 interp letter ballot #28 - due 19-Apr-2013 References: <20130312071208.CC3C8356CD1@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20130312071208.CC3C8356CD1@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On 03/12/2013 08:01 AM, Whitlock, Stan wrote: > WG5 – please find attached the corrected J3 interp letter ballot #28. > Interp F03/0053 is not being balloted. > Subject: J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #28 - due 19-Apr-2013 > Enclosed in the next letter ballot on Fortran interpretations. > > The rules by which we operate say: > > o J3 votes on the answer at a J3 meeting; a simple majority > > vote marks the answer as "passed by J3 meeting". > > o Between J3 meetings the chair of /interp sends a J3 letter > > ballot to J3 to approve interp answers that have been "passed > > by J3 meeting". The letter ballot runs for 30 days. Not > > voting on three of four consecutive J3 letter ballots is > > grounds to terminate J3 membership. An interp answer passes > > by a 2/3rds vote; a no vote must be accompanied by an > > explanation of the changes necessary to change the member's > > vote to yes. > > J3/interp reserves the right to recall an interp answer for > > more study even if the answer passes. > > 12 Fortran interpretations are currently "Passed by J3 meeting" after > > J3 meeting #200. This is the letter ballot phase to go from "Passed > > by J3 meeting" to "Passed by J3 letter ballot". > > The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted: > > Yes No Number Title > > -Y- --- F03/0030 IEEE divide by zero > > -Y- --- F03/0047 Polymorphic arguments to intrinsic procedures > > -Y- --- F03/0064 Recursive declaration of procedure interfaces > > -Y- --- F03/0100 Error in field width for special cases of signed INFINITY output > > -Y- --- F03/0139 Functions returning procedure pointers > > -Y- --- F08/0071 Vector subscript target > > -Y- --- F08/0085 Problems with PARAMETERs > > --- -N- F08/0086 Implied-shape and separate PARAMETER statement I have no qualms with Q1/A1, but I still do not understand Q2 (and hence do not follow A2): Where's b *declared* ? > -Y- --- F08/0087 Mixed-kind character assignment > > -Y- --- F08/0088 Can ALLOCATE with SOURCE= have side-effects in a PURE proc? > > -Y- --- F08/0089 Variable-denoting functions change existing semantics > > -Y- --- F08/0090 What restrictions apply to initialization and PARAMETER? Kind regards, -- Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/ Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news