From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Sun Mar 31 00:37:00 2013
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 0C08A3568E2; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 00:36:59 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from nm16-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm16-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.94.236.19])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FD13568E2
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 00:36:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [66.94.237.196] by nm16.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Mar 2013 23:36:56 -0000
Received: from [98.138.226.242] by tm7.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Mar 2013 23:36:56 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Mar 2013 23:36:56 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1364686616; bh=TASo67OLoRj5AoMZZuJFQr+Xlq8WK9fxboQKQ7oX4vk=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-ID:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4rL8GSXXgfvH4TntfkAZtdODJFkc81DDwcpOt/pKCMDLInb0aTm6yUCJg+LcFPLlcrXQZFgGFjFHnK+B5I4LeOk1CxiYrQ+Gte/4g1Yfr+epVoXfooiqzwPBzIMtLSd/DHGkumuiQqt3OjWYVMCnwB3AiM34JZz8K0rFWUM71ec=
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 497325.68080.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: WUoqlP0VM1l7_vDRQ91YK9Zbh2ECLg_3VGRrIZuC2U.gPRJ
 BOi57iJFpa5Rwh30CLBSh96jtQdK3WnXgTb_YPCSFCZljPVEOV5.4Mio.VkV
 unzV4Snbj.3Gx9F5v24SgedJPb8WF3986Mn15v9Xw0hJRlbJRNXwV5L86IcQ
 spLRuso9JjiWrtdB.oiTDsP1xBjS.kxsr3UJnobDP2Yj9KM.EjpSIG4LIwjq
 CQzuhq0nu8wpr_slajvP8xkF8KTPWAPMChnK9Kiu7hOZmQh_S0JqlteMFSKP
 TlI6xYtlDRVpMUGtoC.jTvTdNU1RtMISLMrqRqiI9qWSHc2JsG87th6v3wQ6
 Qw.KVTHhC9P1czEtR0uZou7Z7a05sXlS5a9QJ5l.o5goIAOJNR5_DJLA4eCb
 KeiVUNJk8_8NpsXNjLjz1gTYAHigape4jGMbkmm4v0qHvo.kJRccbZpSpR_4
 .P.kgUbuIAwDGIAhU4Hgphqa3y21gaJ5DFSw-
X-Yahoo-SMTP: EsWMRgGswBCJ115Lh3i7tuoFc7oZg_W1NL_P8LouqQe9CakaKQ--
X-Rocket-Received: from [192.168.1.70] (van.snyder@172.12.94.57 with login)
        by smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2013 16:36:56 -0700 PDT
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4944) AW: (j3.2006) Thoughts on
 Reinhold's thoughts
From: Van Snyder <van.snyder@sbcglobal.net>
To: sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <Prayer.1.3.5.1303300941320.16551@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20130329203623.0D66F356D96@www.open-std.org>
	 <20130329212446.AD585356D97@www.open-std.org>
	 <Prayer.1.3.5.1303300941320.16551@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 16:36:54 -0700
Message-ID: <1364686614.17222.7.camel@van-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 (2.28.3-30.el6) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 2013-03-30 at 09:41 +0000, N.M. Maclaren wrote:
>     CHANGE TEAMS would synchronise only the subteam, but would do so
> at beginning and end

If CHANGE TEAMS synchronizes, it ultimately synchronizes all of the
images of the current team, but maybe not all of them at the same time.
It should be arranged that each subteam has a separate rendezvous, which
would be better than requiring all images of the current team to
rendezvous before any can proceed.



