From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Fri Jan 18 19:53:13 2013
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 703F2356CA7; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:53:13 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.tiscali.co.uk [212.74.100.53])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56C2356986
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:53:11 +0100 (CET)
X-Trace: 836287523/mk-filter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$THROTTLED_STATIC/TalkTalk_Customer/78.150.178.175/None/John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 78.150.178.175
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
X-SMTP-AUTH: 
X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM
X-MUA: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAHB9+VBOlrKv/2dsb2JhbAANN75OgxEBAQEEOBslEQsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRQYNCAKIIalQimSHfpE5A5YMgRyEPI1m
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,493,1355097600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="836287523"
Received: from host-78-150-178-175.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([78.150.178.175])
  by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2013 16:54:39 +0000
Message-ID: <50F97F1B.3010207@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:58:03 +0000
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) Meeting 201, preliminaries.
References: <50F5B452.4040708@moene.org>
In-Reply-To: <50F5B452.4040708@moene.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk



Toon Moene wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> A question from Steve Lionel prompted me to start looking at the
> logistics of meeting 201 in Delft.
>
> The following is a pointer to a map of Delft with hotels and the train
> stations involved:
>
> https://maps.google.com/maps?q=hotels+in+delft&hl=en&ll=52.000524,4.36758&spn=0.026791,0.084028&sll=51.996138,4.369125&sspn=0.026794,0.084028&hq=hotels&hnear=Delft,+South+Holland,+The+Netherlands&t=m&fll=52.006865,4.361229&fspn=0.053574,0.168056&z=14
>
> In 2005, Matthijs van Waveren made a block booking at the hotel marked
> "I" in the map (Hotel Coen Delft, hotelcoendelft.nl - close to the main
> train station, which is indicated by this white-on-blue square nearby).
>
> Following the train tracks southward, you'll see another "station
> pictogram" near the word "Kruithuisweg" - that's Delft Zuid station.
>
> Our meeting facilities at NEN are approximately 300 metres from that
> station.
>
> In 2005, we walked from Delft's city center to the NEN building (a 35
> minute walk), but the location close to the train station means that
> there is the option of going by train in case of bad weather ...
>
> Do you want me to make a block booking at Hotel Coen, or do you want to
> use this map to find another hotel of your liking nearby ? (as you can
> see, there are about half a dozen hotels within 500 meters - I myself
> stayed at Hotel Leeuwenbrug in 2005).

Actually, Hotel Coen involves a slightly shorter walk. And we used it 
for FIDS in 2005. So I think it makes sense to have a block booking 
there. On the other hand, Alison and I stayed at the Leeuwenbrug for a 
more recent SC22 meeting and preferred it. I am not sure it would work 
for FIDS, however. A final point: you can take the train without staying 
at Hotel Coen.

Cheers,

John.



