From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Sun Jan 6 17:38:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 8D590356A55; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 17:38:16 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from moene.org (moene.org [82.95.66.103]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE98356A36 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 17:38:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] by moene.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TrrNz-0005uB-FL; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 15:39:39 +0100 Message-ID: <50E98CAB.70502@moene.org> Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 15:39:39 +0100 From: Toon Moene Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121122 Icedove/10.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fortran standards email list for J3 CC: John Reid , WG5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4861) Corrigendum 2 References: <50C5B5BB.6020104@stfc.ac.uk> <56E27E0CF27747E19C2189E19F0CF92D@Maru6> <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D76F1F8@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> <50C8AC8B.1010103@stfc.ac.uk> <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D76F244@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> <50C8AF58.3050107@stfc.ac.uk> <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D76F27A@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> <50C8C454.9060201@stfc.ac.uk> <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D76F2DF@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> <3B2101E8CCFD466DBC3F0183CF5695B0@Maru6> <50C9A7CB.8050005@stfc.ac.uk> <20121217114144.AF1683569C0@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20121217114144.AF1683569C0@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On 12/17/2012 10:46 AM, John Reid wrote: > WG5, > > There have been no objections to the draft result N1952-2 of letter > ballot 5 on interpretations, so this becomes N1952. Meanwhile, David has > constructed a draft Corrigendum 2, which is attached. > > I am now start a letter ballot on this, with the 9 a.m. (UK time) on 7 > January 2013. There are two dates mentioned in this mail (7 Jan 2013 as above and 14 Jan 2013 further down). I'll play safe and answer today :-) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Please answer the following question "Is N1948, with the references and notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as Corrigendum 2 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways. 1) Yes. 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. 3) No, for the following reasons. 4) Abstain. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I vote yes. -- Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/ Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news