From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Fri Jan  4 13:09:29 2013
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 9FAC1356A93; Fri,  4 Jan 2013 13:09:29 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.tiscali.co.uk [212.74.100.55])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933093568FF
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri,  4 Jan 2013 13:09:27 +0100 (CET)
X-Trace: 827875871/mk-filter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$THROTTLED_STATIC/TalkTalk_Customer/2.97.118.78/None/John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 2.97.118.78
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
X-SMTP-AUTH: 
X-Originating-Country: XX/UNKNOWN
X-MUA: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBACyq5lACYXZO/2dsb2JhbAANOL1lgxIBAQQ4GyURLBYPCQMCAQIBRQYNCAKuQIoqhheRGQOWDIVYjWQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,409,1355097600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="827875871"
Received: from host-2-97-118-78.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.97.118.78])
  by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2013 10:10:52 +0000
Message-ID: <50E6AB74.8060402@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:14:12 +0000
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Vote on Corrigendum 2
References: <20130103173734.3AE13356AA1@www.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130103173734.3AE13356AA1@www.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Please answer the following question "Is N1948, with the references and 
notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as
Corrigendum 2 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways.
1) Yes.
2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.
3) No, for the following reasons.
4) Abstain.

I vote "yes".

John.