From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Tue Jan  1 18:38:25 2013
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 32C8E356A42; Tue,  1 Jan 2013 18:38:25 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.tiscali.co.uk [212.74.100.55])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE5F356988
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue,  1 Jan 2013 18:38:21 +0100 (CET)
X-Trace: 827450276/mk-filter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$THROTTLED_DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/88.104.245.4/None/d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 88.104.245.4
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk
X-SMTP-AUTH: 
X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM
X-MUA: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiUCAPoC41BYaPUE/2dsb2JhbAANOIF/u26DEQEBAQMBfgsLRleIJqZAgzCOQI1xgkhhA5tkjWQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,391,1355097600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="827450276"
Received: from 88-104-245-4.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([88.104.245.4])
  by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 01 Jan 2013 15:39:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.4861) Corrigendum 2
From: David Muxworthy <d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20121217114144.AF1683569C0@www.open-std.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 15:39:46 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <80D8D2BC-6BE2-42F3-BB0A-01C873856EC5@bcs.org.uk>
References: <50C5B5BB.6020104@stfc.ac.uk> <56E27E0CF27747E19C2189E19F0CF92D@Maru6> <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D76F1F8@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> <50C8AC8B.1010103@stfc.ac.uk> <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D76F244@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> <50C8AF58.3050107@stfc.ac.uk> <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D76F27A@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> <50C8C454.9060201@stfc.ac.uk> <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D76F2DF@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> <3B2101E8CCFD466DBC3F0183CF5695B0@Maru6> <50C9A7CB.8050005@stfc.ac.uk> <20121217114144.AF1683569C0@www.open-std.org>
To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

> Please answer the following question "Is N1948, with the references =
and=20
> notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as
> Corrigendum 2 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways.=20
>=20
> 1) Yes.
> 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.=20
> 3) No, for the following reasons.
> 4) Abstain.

My vote is yes, but I recommend the following changes.

1.  In the edit at 294:42-295:2, =93If ... undefined=94 should read =93If =
... undefined.=94.

2.  In the edit at 296:4-5, a full stop should immediately follow =
"effective argument".

3.  In the edit at 325:7-12, =93A program ... invoked=94 should read =93A =
program ... invoked.=94

David