From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Fri Dec 28 06:47:07 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id B50AF3569E2; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 06:47:07 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA8C356992 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 06:47:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Dec 2012 19:47:32 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,366,1355126400"; d="scan'208,217";a="239690597" Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.130]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Dec 2012 19:48:28 -0800 Received: from orsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.151]) by ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.132]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:48:28 -0800 From: "Whitlock, Stan" To: WG5 CC: "Whitlock, Stan" Subject: WG5/N1954 - letter ballot on F2008 draft Corrigendum N1948 Thread-Topic: WG5/N1954 - letter ballot on F2008 draft Corrigendum N1948 Thread-Index: Ac3krbpX28IWfjNHS9yIhCIkVu3V1g== Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 03:48:27 +0000 Message-ID: <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D771C81@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.140] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D771C81ORSMSX107amrcor_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk --_000_4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D771C81ORSMSX107amrcor_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My answer to the letter ballot question below is "yes". John and David, thank you for your efforts. /Stan Whitlock Intel Corporation ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1954 WG5 letter ballot on draft Corrigendum 2 John Reid, 17 December 2012 This is a WG5 letter ballot on N1948, the draft Corrigendum 2 for Fortran 2008. It was constructed by David Muxworthy and has been checked by me. The notes in italics will be removed from the final version, as will the references to interpretation numbers and page and line numbers in the standard. Please answer the following question "Is N1948, with the references and notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as Corrigendum 2 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways. 1) Yes. 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. 3) No, for the following reasons. 4) Abstain. This is an individual vote. Please send your vote to sc22wg5@open-std.org to arrive by 9 a.m. (UK time) on January 14, 2013. --_000_4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D771C81ORSMSX107amrcor_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

My answer to the letter ballot question below is = 220;yes”.

John and David, thank you for your efforts.

/Stan Whitlock

Intel Corporation

<= /p>

&nbs= p; &= nbsp; &nbs= p; ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1954

&nbs= p; &= nbsp; &nbs= p; &= nbsp;

&nbs= p; WG5 letter ballot on draf= t Corrigendum 2

&nbs= p; = John Reid, 17 December 2012

This is a WG5 letter ballot on N1948, the draft Corr= igendum 2 for

Fortran 2008. It was constructed by David Muxworthy = and has been checked

by me. The notes in italics will be removed from the= final version, as

will the references to interpretation numbers and pa= ge and line numbers

in the standard.

Please answer the following question "Is N1948,= with the references and

notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for= publication as

Corrigendum 2 for Fortran 2008?" in one of thes= e ways.

1) Yes.

2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. =

3) No, for the following reasons.

4) Abstain.

This is an individual vote. Please send your vote to= sc22wg5@open-std.org

to arrive by 9 a.m. (UK time) on January 14, 2013. <= o:p>

--_000_4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D771C81ORSMSX107amrcor_--