From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Fri Dec 28 05:45:41 2012
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 9D480356A37; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 05:45:41 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from nag-j.co.jp (nag-j.co.jp [111.68.142.10])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCC4356A01
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 05:45:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Maru6 (218-42-159-105.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp [218.42.159.105])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by nag-j.co.jp (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBS2l2vM078962
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:47:04 GMT
	(envelope-from malcolm@nag-j.co.jp)
Message-ID: <56278EABAEAF4BAE8CDB6161CEE0BC9E@Maru6>
From: "Malcolm Cohen" <malcolm@nag-j.co.jp>
To: "WG5" <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <50C5B5BB.6020104@stfc.ac.uk><56E27E0CF27747E19C2189E19F0CF92D@Maru6><4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D76F1F8@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com><50C8AC8B.1010103@stfc.ac.uk><4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D76F244@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com><50C8AF58.3050107@stfc.ac.uk><4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D76F27A@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com><50C8C454.9060201@stfc.ac.uk><4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D30D76F2DF@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com><3B2101E8CCFD466DBC3F0183CF5695B0@Maru6><50C9A7CB.8050005@stfc.ac.uk> <20121217114144.AF1683569C0@www.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20121217114144.AF1683569C0@www.open-std.org>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4861) Corrigendum 2
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:47:06 +0900
Organization: =?UTF-8?B?5pel5pysTkFH?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="UTF-8";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

>Please answer the following question "Is N1948, with the references and 
>notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as
>Corrigendum 2 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways. 
>
>1) Yes.

Yes.

>2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. 
>3) No, for the following reasons.
>4) Abstain.

Cheers,
-- 
................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.