From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Mon Oct 8 19:12:36 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 15F4F356905; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 19:12:36 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.tiscali.co.uk [212.74.100.55]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DC93565B6 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 19:12:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Trace: 813341205/mk-filter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$THROTTLED_STATIC/TalkTalk_Customer/92.21.148.118/None/John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 92.21.148.118 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk X-SMTP-AUTH: X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM X-MUA: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqQBAE4Ic1BcFZR2/2dsb2JhbAANOIJLiSW2ZQEBBA4KFSYSAgEMBBEsFgQLCQMCAQIBOwoGDQgCFq44ii6JCItPhhADjm6GfYVPjU0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,555,1344207600"; d="scan'208,217";a="813341205" Received: from host-92-21-148-118.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.21.148.118]) by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2012 18:12:28 +0100 Message-ID: <5073097D.7020304@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:12:29 +0100 From: John Reid User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: Fwd: The TMB's decision w.r.t "Use of the Committee Draft (CD) Stage" IT'S OPTIONAL, which is what we wanted References: <001901cda0cc$fe2dcf40$fa896dc0$@RexJaeschke.com> In-Reply-To: <001901cda0cc$fe2dcf40$fa896dc0$@RexJaeschke.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <001901cda0cc$fe2dcf40$fa896dc0$@RexJaeschke.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070702060105060608060600" Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070702060105060608060600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit WG5, Good news re the CD stage. John. --------------070702060105060608060600 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="The TMB's decision w_r_t \"Use of the Committee Draft (CD) Stage\" IT'S OPTIONAL, which is what we wanted.eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*0="The TMB's decision w_r_t \"Use of the Committee Draft (CD) S"; filename*1="tage\" IT'S OPTIONAL, which is what we wanted.eml" Received: from mx2.net.stfc.ac.uk (172.16.133.37) by EXCHHUB01.fed.cclrc.ac.uk (130.246.236.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.379.0; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 19:38:36 +0100 X-RAL-MFrom: X-RAL-Connect: Received: from engine29-1277-4.icritical.com (engine29-1277-4.icritical.com [212.57.248.93]) by mx2.net.stfc.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id q92IcXie005294 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 19:38:35 +0100 Received: (qmail 10792 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2012 18:38:32 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by engine29-1277-4.icritical.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2012 18:38:32 -0000 Delivered-To: clean-quarantine X-Envelope-From: X-Envelope-To: Received: from engine29-1277-4.icritical.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (engine29-1277-4.icritical.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 10067-07 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 19:38:29 +0100 (BST) Received: (qmail 10751 invoked by uid 599); 2 Oct 2012 18:38:29 -0000 X-ICVU: 250 Cache recipient OK Received: from unknown (HELO ny-webmail.ANSI.org) (63.241.103.29) by engine29-1277-4.icritical.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:38:29 +0100 Received: from MAILLIST ([192.168.4.23]) by ny-webmail.ANSI.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:38:26 -0400 Received: by MAILLIST.ANSI.ORG (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 16.0) with spool id 418244 for SC22INFO@MAILLIST.ANSI.ORG; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:38:24 -0400 Received: from smg03.internetmailserver.net by maillist.ansi.org (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.000E5181@maillist.ansi.org>; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:38:23 -0400 Received: from sm03.internetmailserver.net (sm03.dotnetplayground.com [192.168.120.23]) by smg03.internetmailserver.net with SMTP; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:37:23 -0700 Received: from Zeus (244.32.123.74.lucketts.net [74.123.32.244]) by sm03.internetmailserver.net with SMTP; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:37:02 -0700 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001A_01CDA0AB.771EA040" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac2gytlum43Y5h54RoO28xVFyxCkFQ== Content-Language: en-us Message-ID: <001901cda0cc$fe2dcf40$fa896dc0$@RexJaeschke.com> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:37:35 -0400 Reply-To: Rex Jaeschke From: Rex Jaeschke Organization: C#, VB, .NET, C, C++, Java Seminars and Consulting Subject: The TMB's decision w.r.t "Use of the Committee Draft (CD) Stage" IT'S OPTIONAL, which is what we wanted To: Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Oct 2012 18:38:26.0406 (UTC) FILETIME=[1C1DB060:01CDA0CD] X-Virus-Scanned: by iCritical at engine29-1277-4.icritical.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.762 tagged_above=4.40 quarantined_above=10.00 tests=BAYES_00, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Level: X-CCLRC-SPAM-report: 4.501 : BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE,RAL_REPCAPS5SUB X-CCLRC-SPAM-bar: xxxx X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 130.246.135.224 Return-Path: owner-sc22info@MAILLIST.ANSI.ORG X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: EXCHHUB01.fed.cclrc.ac.uk X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: REXJAESCHKE.COM X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: None Received-SPF: None (EXCHHUB01.fed.cclrc.ac.uk: rex@REXJAESCHKE.COM does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AVStamp-Mailbox: MSFTFF;1;0;0 0 0 MIME-Version: 1.0 ------=_NextPart_000_001A_01CDA0AB.771EA040 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Adopted at the 55th meeting of the Technical Management Board, San Diego (USA), 17-18 September 2012 Use of the Committee Draft (CD) Stage The Technical Management Board, Recognizing the need to make the ISO standards development process more efficient and cost effective, Noting the conclusions from the Living Lab and feedback from the June 2011 Chairs' conference and results of the Living Lab pilots conducted so far, Decides to promote the optional implementation of the Committee Draft (CD) stage, and that the decision to use the CD stage should remain with the committee, Suggests that when deciding whether or not to use the CD stage committees should balance the reasons for doing so against the possible increased costs and timescale, Further noting the results of the survey carried out by the ISO Central Secretariat (ISO/CS) on the information committees might need if the CD were eliminated, Asks ISO/CS to prepare a guidance document on best practices for deciding whether or not to use the CD which will be submitted to the TMB for review prior to its circulation, Requests ISO/CS to provide the TMB with data on the implementation of the optional CD at its June 2013 meeting. Rex ------=_NextPart_000_001A_01CDA0AB.771EA040 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <= style>

Adopte= d at the 55th meeting of the Technical Management Board, San Diego (USA), 1= 7-18 September 2012

 <= /p>

Use of the Committee Draft (CD) Stage<= /p>

 

The T= echnical Management Board,

 =

Recognizing the need to make the ISO stand= ards development process more efficient and cost

effective,

 

Noting the conclusions from the Living Lab and= feedback from the June 2011 Chairs' conference and

results of the Living Lab pilots conducted so far,

 

Dec= ides to promote the optional implementation of the Committee Draft (CD) sta= ge, and that the

decision to use the = CD stage should remain with the committee,

 

Suggests that when decidin= g whether or not to use the CD stage committees should balance the

reasons for doing so against the possible inc= reased costs and timescale,

 = ;

Further noting the results of the survey = carried out by the ISO Central Secretariat (ISO/CS) on the

<= p class=3D"MsoNormal">information committees might need if the CD were elim= inated,

 

Asks ISO/CS to prepare a guidance document on best practices= for deciding whether or not to use the

CD which will be submitted to the TMB for review prior to its circulatio= n,

 

Requests ISO/CS to provide the TMB with data on the implementation= of the optional CD at its

June 2013 m= eeting.

 

Rex

 

= ------=_NextPart_000_001A_01CDA0AB.771EA040-- --------------070702060105060608060600--