From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Sat Sep 29 17:31:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id B2A9E3569B2; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:31:00 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mk-filter-1-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-1-a-1.mail.tiscali.co.uk [212.74.100.52]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF62356947 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:30:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Trace: 820353623/mk-filter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$THROTTLED_STATIC/TalkTalk_Customer/92.21.181.104/None/John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 92.21.181.104 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk X-SMTP-AUTH: X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM X-MUA: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAJYTZ1BcFbVo/2dsb2JhbAANOMFYAQEBBAEBATUbGwoBECMJFg8JAwIBAgEVMBMBBQICiAymOYoxiQiLH4MrgyADlWmBFYQ6jUQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,509,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="820353623" Received: from host-92-21-181-104.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.21.181.104]) by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2012 16:30:54 +0100 Message-ID: <5067142D.5090207@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:30:53 +0100 From: John Reid User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: longb@cray.com CC: sc22wg5 Subject: Interop TS: ballot response References: <20120921082020.BF310356909@www.open-std.org> <20120927221554.43F6F3569AC@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20120927221554.43F6F3569AC@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Bill Long wrote: > Given the lack of replies suggesting another ballot (at least ones > posted to the list), I'm inclined to not have another ballot. I feel wary of going ahead on the basis of a lack of replies, so I have decided to have a short (8-day) WG5 ballot. The fourth ballot on interps has now closed and this (hopefully) is an easy one. Please send your relies to the WG5 list by 9 a.m. (UK time) on 8 October 2012. Cheers, John. > > Cheers, > Bill > > > On 9/21/12 3:20 AM, John Reid wrote: >> WG5, >> >> Here is a draft response to the ballot comments from Germany (see N1938) >> and the corresponding changed Draft TS. The edits in N1941 have been >> discussed by J3. The whole response was constructed by Bill and has been >> checked by me and Reinhold. I would like now to open up the discussion >> to the whole of WG5. Is this response OK? Do you want another ballot? (I >> feel that I have been doing too many of these lately.) >> >> Cheers, >> >> John. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> J3 mailing list >> J3@mailman.j3-fortran.org >> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3 >> >