From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Sep 25 09:27:55 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 33BB135692A; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:27:55 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B963568DA for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:27:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:49445) by ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1TGPYf-000500-q7 (Exim 4.72) (return-path ); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:27:53 +0100 Received: from prayer by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1TGPYf-0004A3-4d (Exim 4.72) (return-path ); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:27:53 +0100 Received: from [87.113.183.229] by webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.5); 25 Sep 2012 08:27:53 +0100 Date: 25 Sep 2012 08:27:53 +0100 From: "N.M. Maclaren" To: John Reid Cc: WG5 Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4752) Fourth WG5 ballot on interpretations Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20120902160848.E514F35693A@www.open-std.org> References: <501BB236.4000004@stfc.ac.uk> <20120902160848.E514F35693A@www.open-std.org> X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Herewith my votes. Regards, Nick Maclaren. Yes No Number Title --- --- F08/0043 Executing a type-bound procedure on a coindexed object -Y- --- F08/0048 Sequence association for coarrays -Y- --- F08/0054 Requirements for needing an explicit interface --- --- F08/0055 G editing for reals --- --- F08/0056 Non-polymorphic ALLOCATE with polymorphic SOURCE= -Y- --- F08/0057 Interoperability with empty types -Y- --- F08/0058 ENTRY point RESULT variable --- --- F08/0059 Auto-targetting requirements -Y- --- F08/0060 Procedure pointer assignment with an EXTERNAL target -Y- --- F08/0061 Description of the CONTIGUOUS attribute misworded? -Y- --- F08/0062 Mixing default initialization with DATA initialization -C- --- F08/0063 G editing to a narrow output field -Y- --- F08/0064 STATUS of GET_ENVIRONMENT_VARIABLE -C- --- F08/0065 Should certain procedures in intrinsic modules be pure? --- --- F08/0066 Are certain expressions with pointer initialization constant? --- --- F08/0067 Passing arrays of extended type objects --- --- F08/0068 Pointer association and extended type arrays --- --- F08/0069 Which part of an effective argument becomes undefined? --- --- F08/0070 Finalization of INTENT(OUT) arguments -Y- --- F08/0072 Final subroutines with corank --- --- F08/0073 Polymorphic auto-targetting Comment on F08/0063 This is a good candidate for improvement in a future revision. Comment on F08/0065 Upon checking on what this meant, I believe that the lists in tables 14.1 and 14.2 contain some errors. Specifically, I can see no reason for IEEE_GET_ROUNDING MODE and IEEE_GET_UNDERFLOW MODE not to be pure (but they aren't), but I can see good reasons for IEEE_SET_FLAG and IEEE_SET_HALTING_MODE not to be (and they are). However, even if true, that is a matter for a separate interpretation.