From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Fri Sep 21 10:56:46 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id DE74A356909; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:56:46 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E5A356905 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:56:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:47576) by ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:nmm1) id 1TEz2S-0001hP-rk (Exim 4.72) for sc22wg5@open-std.org (return-path ); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:56:44 +0100 Received: from prayer by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local (PRAYER:nmm1) id 1TEz2S-0007Ir-FT (Exim 4.72) for sc22wg5@open-std.org (return-path ); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:56:44 +0100 Received: from [91.125.14.229] by webmail.hermes.cam.ac.uk with HTTP (Prayer-1.3.5); 21 Sep 2012 09:56:44 +0100 Date: 21 Sep 2012 09:56:44 +0100 From: "N.M. Maclaren" To: WG5 Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4792) Interop TS: ballot response Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20120921082020.BF310356909@www.open-std.org> References: <20120921082020.BF310356909@www.open-std.org> X-Mailer: Prayer v1.3.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On Sep 21 2012, John Reid wrote: > >Here is a draft response to the ballot comments from Germany (see N1938) >and the corresponding changed Draft TS. The edits in N1941 have been >discussed by J3. The whole response was constructed by Bill and has been >checked by me and Reinhold. I would like now to open up the discussion >to the whole of WG5. Is this response OK? Do you want another ballot? (I >feel that I have been doing too many of these lately.) In my view, no. When I saw those comments, my reaction was "Oops!" Those edits correct a couple of clear oversights. Regards, Nick Maclaren.