From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Sep 18 10:07:47 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 2DA32356930; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from nag-j.co.jp (nag-j.co.jp [111.68.142.10]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CBF356666 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:07:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Maru6 (218-42-159-105.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp [218.42.159.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by nag-j.co.jp (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8I87aLu024063 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:07:42 GMT (envelope-from malcolm@nag-j.co.jp) Message-ID: From: "Malcolm Cohen" To: "sc22wg5" References: <20120914232724.BB7E5356938@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20120914232724.BB7E5356938@www.open-std.org> Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4776) [WG5 letter ballot 4 on Fortran 2008interpretations] Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:07:35 +0900 Organization: =?UTF-8?B?5pel5pysTkFH?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Van Snyder wrote: >-C- --- F08/0057 Interoperability with empty types > > Does this need a compatibility caveat in 1.6? I think not. Fortran 2003/8 says it interoperates with "struct t {};", and as the interp says: "How can a type be interoperable with a syntax error?". i.e. the standard does not make sense => the code snippet is not actually conforming in the first place. Cheers, -- ................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.