From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Thu Sep 13 08:46:07 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 6DBB4356924; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:46:07 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3303568F1 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:46:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q8D6k3Hb025710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 06:46:04 GMT Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8D6k2pS017667 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 06:46:03 GMT Received: from abhmt104.oracle.com (abhmt104.oracle.com [141.146.116.56]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q8D6k276000889 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:46:02 -0500 Received: from [10.132.140.77] (/10.132.140.77) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 23:46:02 -0700 Message-ID: <505180CF.3070706@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 23:44:31 -0700 From: Robert Corbett Reply-To: robert.corbett@oracle.com Organization: Oracle America User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS sun4u; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110814 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: WG5 letter ballot on N1929 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk > Please answer the following question "Is N1929 ready for forwarding to WG23 > as the Fortran Annex to TR 24772?" in one of these ways. > > 1) Yes. > 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. > 3) No, for the following reasons. > 4) Abstain. My answer is 3) No, for the following reasons. Oracle's standards board opposes the base document TR 24772:2010. I assume that Oracle's standards board would oppose the Fortran Annex. I asked for explicit guidance on this question, but I have not yet received a response. Based on the information available to me, I vote no. Robert Corbett representing Oracle America