From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Aug 7 20:23:48 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 9B1B33568FE; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 20:23:48 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.tiscali.co.uk [212.74.100.55]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A1B3568F1 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 20:23:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Trace: 793668291/mk-filter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$THROTTLED_STATIC/TalkTalk_Customer/2.101.25.177/None/John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 2.101.25.177 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk X-SMTP-AUTH: X-Originating-Country: XX/UNKNOWN X-MUA: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBADRcIVACZRmx/2dsb2JhbAANOL0MAQEBBDgbJRELGAkWDwkDAgECAUUGDQgCr3mLKYkEiw+GYAOVSIVIjSQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,728,1336345200"; d="scan'208";a="793668291" Received: from host-2-101-25-177.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.101.25.177]) by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2012 19:22:45 +0100 Message-ID: <50215CF4.2020206@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 19:22:44 +0100 From: John Reid User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sc22wg5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4721) WG5 letter ballot 3 References: <20120804040444.460F63568DA@www.open-std.org> <20120806212738.70CE53568F2@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20120806212738.70CE53568F2@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Bill Long wrote: > > > On 8/3/12 10:50 PM, Van Snyder wrote: >> ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1933 >> >> WG5 letter ballot 3 on Fortran 2008 interpretations >> John Reid, 3 August 2012 >> > >> --- --- F08/0040 MOVE_ALLOC for coarrays >> >> No vote here because F08/0040 is not included in N1932. This can >> be included in the next ballot if a revision of N1932 that includes >> F08/0040 accompanies that ballot. >> > > I believe this was an oversight in the ballot (N1933), and not a defect > in N1932. F08/0040 was the topic of 12-168r1 at meeting 198 in Markham. > The next step for it should be a J3 Letter ballot, not a WG5 ballot. Yes, I goofed when constructing N1933. Sorry, everyone. This should not be in N1933. Please ignore it when sending in your ballot. John.