From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Sun Jan 29 23:09:10 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 3445635698A; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:09:10 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 715 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:09:08 CET Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC01435692E for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:09:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2012 13:56:56 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="101677462" Received: from orsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.211]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2012 13:56:56 -0800 Received: from orsmsx151.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.226.38) by orsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.226.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:56:56 -0800 Received: from orsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.175]) by ORSMSX151.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.182]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:56:55 -0800 From: "Whitlock, Stan" To: WG5 CC: "Whitlock, Stan" Subject: RE: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4614) Corrigendum 1 Thread-Topic: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4614) Corrigendum 1 Thread-Index: AQHM2r5Z2Y+G6vJKp0quEu/FBej/tpYj6saw Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:56:55 +0000 Message-ID: <4AA982B1265F43408480F737BE12F4D303083D@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20120124173302.D38C4356974@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20120124173302.D38C4356974@www.open-std.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.138] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk John and DavidM, I have gone through David's N1901 to correct the edits on the interps that = go with the edits in Corrigendum 1. Everything makes sense - it looks good= . I briefly went through N1902 and N10903 and didn't see anything obvious = missing. I hope to have a new 12-006Ar2 for m197. John did a great job on getting the ballots reflected completely in the cor= rigendum and David did a great job producing various drafts until we now ha= ve Corrigendum 1 for F2008. I'll work from N1902 since I like line numbers= . Thanks /Stan -----Original Message----- From: j3-bounces@j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces@j3-fortran.org] On Behal= f Of John Reid Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:33 PM To: WG5 Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4614) Corrigendum 1 WG5, On 22 December, I said > The draft result is attached. Please let me know ASAP if I have missed = > your ballot or made any other mistake. > > No-one voted NO and only two voted YES with comments, so the ballot > p= asses, subject to the comments being addressed. > > The comments have been discussed by email by Malcolm Cohen, Robert > Co= rbett, David Muxworthy, and Bill Long. The revised version is N1901. > This has annotations showing what changes have been made. Please let > = me know by 1 Jan if you have any comments on this. David will then > produ= ce a final WG5 draft without the annotations and prepare the > version to = send to SC22. N1901 was sent to you by David on the same day. No-one has commented, so I = regard N1901 as defining the corrigendum. The annotations in yellow in N1901 show the proposed changes from N1893 arising from discussions between= those who made comments in the ballot. David has now prepared a new version, N1902, without these annotations and = with some changes to the comments in italics (which are for WG5 only). He h= as made one editorial change to the actual text, which is with respect to s= paces in the edits for clause 13.5, as requested by Malcolm. David has also prepared the text for the actual corrigendum, N1903. This is= the same as N1902, except that the comments in italics have been removed. I have changed N1896 slightly from the version (N1896-1) that I sent on 22 December. I have added the late comments that came from Malcolm and I no= w show how each comment was addressed. I attach N1896, N1902, and N1903. I think N1903 is ready to send to SC22. H= owever, I will wait until next Monday in case anyone sees any problems. Best wishes, John.