From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Dec 13 09:22:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 22CC7356950; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:22:34 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mailrelay2.lrz-muenchen.de (mailrelay2.lrz-muenchen.de [129.187.254.102]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D98035694F for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:22:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de ([10.156.6.19] [10.156.6.19]) by mailrelay2.lrz-muenchen.de with ESMTP for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:22:20 +0100 Received: from BADWLRZ-SWHBT2.ads.mwn.de (BADWLRZ-SWHBT2.ads.mwn.de [IPv6:2001:4ca0:0:108::126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51E92A4131 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:22:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from BADWLRZ-SWMBX1.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::11b4:b130:c4e2:2d0e]) by BADWLRZ-SWHBT2.ads.mwn.de ([fe80::5951:9dc3:7b2b:14ba%13]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:22:20 +0100 From: "Bader, Reinhold" To: "sc22wg5@open-std.org" Subject: Corrigendum 1 Thread-Topic: Corrigendum 1 Thread-Index: Acy5b7rPbkPlDwkMReyxwiu77xursA== Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:22:19 +0000 Message-Id: <166ED263DF83324D9A3BA67FB6772B2B45AD8272@BADWLRZ-SWMBX1.ads.mwn.de> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [129.187.48.206] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_166ED263DF83324D9A3BA67FB6772B2B45AD8272BADWLRZSWMBX1ad_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk --_000_166ED263DF83324D9A3BA67FB6772B2B45AD8272BADWLRZSWMBX1ad_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/15/11 4:22 AM, John Reid wrote: Please answer the following question "Is N1893, with the references and not= es removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as Corrigendu= m 1 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways. 1) Yes. 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. 3) No, for the following reasons. 4) Abstain. This is an individual vote. Please send your vote to sc22wg5@open-std.org to arrive by 9 a.m. (UK time) on December 13, 2= 011. 4) Abstain Sorry, I could not find any time to review the Corrigendum Regards Reinhold --_000_166ED263DF83324D9A3BA67FB6772B2B45AD8272BADWLRZSWMBX1ad_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 11/15/11 4:22 AM, John Reid = wrote:

Please answer the following que= stion "Is N1893, with the references and notes removed, acceptable for= submission to SC22 for publication as Corrigendum 1 for Fortran 2008?"= ; in one of these ways.

1) Yes.

2) Yes, but I recommend the fol= lowing changes.

3) No, for the following reason= s.

4) Abstain.

This is an individual vote. Ple= ase send your vote to sc22wg5= @open-std.org to arrive by 9 a.m. (UK time)= on December 13, 2011.

4) Abstain

Sorry, I could not find any tim= e to review the Corrigendum

Regards

Reinhold

--_000_166ED263DF83324D9A3BA67FB6772B2B45AD8272BADWLRZSWMBX1ad_--