From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Tue Dec 13 00:28:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 67D35356944; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:28:14 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from exprod6og106.obsmtp.com (exprod6og106.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.191]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A988356910 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:28:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from cfexcas01.americas.cray.com ([136.162.34.12]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob106.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTuaOCeuh4mcrNaqvg9EC181ol8kpnCHc@postini.com; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:28:12 PST Received: from CFWEX01.americas.cray.com (172.30.88.25) by cfexcas01.americas.cray.com (172.30.74.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.192.1; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:28:08 -0600 Received: from cfasa-vpn-192-168-233-119in.us.cray.com (192.168.233.119) by CFWEX01.americas.cray.com (172.30.88.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.339.1; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:28:08 -0600 Message-ID: <4EE68E08.6050209@cray.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:28:08 -0600 From: Bill Long Reply-To: Organization: Cray Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sc22wg5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4586) Corrigendum 1 References: <20111115103238.7CF7A3568EC@www.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20111115103238.7CF7A3568EC@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk On 11/15/11 4:22 AM, John Reid wrote: Please answer the following question "Is N1893, with the references and notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as Corrigendum 1 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways. 1) Yes. 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. 3) No, for the following reasons. 4) Abstain. This is an individual vote. Please send your vote to sc22wg5@open-std.org to arrive by 9 a.m. (UK time) on December 13, 2011. 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. Comment 1: This is not a comment on David's work, but rather an observation of something that might have been overlooked. In the edits for [76:10-] para 9 of 4.5.6.3 is moved to the beginning of the subclause. But the Note 4.49, which naturally refers to that paragraph did not get moved. Should it have been moved as well, or put at the end of the subclause as is often done with notes? The Note now seems out of place. Comment 2: Edit citation [246:15] should have been [246:15+]. Note that neither of these comments needs to be addressed for the Corrigendum to pass. The first concerns the placement of a Note that can easily be addressed in the next revision. The second relates to text that will be deleted before sending to ISO. These are for consideration mainly if other comments require changes. Cheers, Bill -- Bill Long longb@cray.com Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024 Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142 Cray Inc./Cray Plaza, Suite 210/380 Jackson St./St. Paul, MN 55101