From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Mon Nov 28 16:22:55 2011
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id E15D9356929; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:22:55 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.tiscali.co.uk [212.74.100.53])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CB8356910
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:22:49 +0100 (CET)
X-Trace: 702946844/mk-filter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED/TalkTalk_Customer/2.101.21.56/None/John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 2.101.21.56
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
X-SMTP-AUTH: 
X-Originating-Country: XX/UNKNOWN
X-MUA: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:8.0.1) Gecko/20111121 Firefox/8.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.5
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAAim004CZRU4/2dsb2JhbAAMNw6EdahzAQEEIxUbJQEQJQIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUTAQcCrSKRXIEwhh2Bf4EWBJRKhSyMKDc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,584,1315177200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="702946844"
Received: from host-2-101-21-56.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.101.21.56])
  by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 28 Nov 2011 15:22:45 +0000
Message-ID: <4ED3A743.2040104@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:22:43 +0000
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0.1) Gecko/20111121 Firefox/8.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
CC: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Result of the letter ballot on N1885 and N1886
References: <4ECA93C1.7020207@stfc.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4ECA93C1.7020207@stfc.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

WG5,

There have been no objections to the provisional result of the letter
ballot on N1885 and N1886 that I sent out a week ago, so I have put this
on the server as N1895.

I said then
>
> Clearly, the current draft TR is not ready yet for forwarding. My
> suggestion is that the interop. email group discuss what further edits
> are needed and if they reach consensus on a revised draft, this is
> subject to a short WG ballot (two weeks?). Is this acceptable?
>
> No-one has commented on the response document, N1886. I take this to
> mean that it is acceptable as it is.

Bill agrees with this and no-one else has objected, so let's run with 
this plan.

Best wishes,

John.