From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Sun Nov 20 14:46:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id CCD58356921; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:46:56 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 568 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at www5.open-std.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:46:56 CET Received: from mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.tiscali.co.uk [212.74.100.55]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFA3356867 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:46:55 +0100 (CET) X-Trace: 693088709/mk-filter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/88.104.240.17/None/d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 88.104.240.17 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk X-SMTP-AUTH: X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM X-MUA: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIBACsCyU5YaPAR/2dsb2JhbAAMOK02AQEBAwE4AkQLC0ZXiBy1QIcCgxUEmWWMXA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,542,1315177200"; d="scan'208";a="693088709" Received: from 88-104-240-17.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([88.104.240.17]) by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2011 13:37:26 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) In-Reply-To: <20111019141328.42FAD35690F@www.open-std.org> References: <20111019141328.42FAD35690F@www.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Muxworthy Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.4574) WG5 vote on draft DTS on further interoperability with C Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 13:37:42 +0000 To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk > Please answer the following question "Are N1885 and N1866 ready for > forwarding > to SC22 as the DTS and the response to the PDTS ballot?" in one of > these ways. > 1) Yes. > 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. > 3) No, for the following reasons. > 4) Abstain. I abstain. David