From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Oct 19 05:51:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 453C1356910; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:51:42 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from ns.nag-j.co.jp (218-42-159-107.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp [218.42.159.107]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866213568F5 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:51:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 218-42-159-108.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp ([218.42.159.108] helo=Maru6) by ns.nag-j.co.jp with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1RGNBs-0007FU-3T for sc22wg5@open-std.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:51:40 +0900 Message-ID: From: "Malcolm Cohen" To: "WG5" Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.4567) WG5 letter ballot 2 on Fortran 2008interpretations Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:51:42 +0900 Organization: =?UTF-8?B?5pel5pysTkFH?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3538.513 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3538.513 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Reinhold Bader further writes <<< F08/0047 The discussion of the interp (which was rather shortened down compared to the original paper) says that "The PUBLIC statement at A contradicts the PRIVATE attribute at B which violates the standard." If this refers to the constraint C514 I conclude that my vote must be "NO", since we're talking about two entities here, one being the type definition and the other one being the generic. It appears that the situation that use-name and generic-spec in R525 can be the same has not been adequately addressed. >>> You can vote no, but the answer is still that you have specified both PUBLIC FOO and PRIVATE FOO and that is not allowed. FOO the identifier is a single entity no matter how many other entities can be accessed by FOO. Don't just stop reading when you reach the end of C514, keep going and read 5.3.2p2 - it is explicit stated that accessibility applies to identifiers. We have had identifiers being usable to access multiple entities since F90, this is not a new issue and is completely covered by the existing text in the standard. Cheers, -- ................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo. -- ................................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.