From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Mon Oct 17 16:19:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 5A24235690E; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:19:33 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from engine29-1277-4.icritical.com (engine29-1277-4.icritical.com [212.57.248.93]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1D823568D5 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:19:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 1897 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2011 14:20:12 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by engine29-1277-4.icritical.com with SMTP; 17 Oct 2011 14:20:12 -0000 Received: from engine29-1277-4.icritical.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (engine29-1277-4.icritical.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 01660-03 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:20:10 +0100 (BST) Received: (qmail 1849 invoked by uid 599); 17 Oct 2011 14:20:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO exchhub03.rl.ac.uk) (130.246.236.9) by engine29-1277-4.icritical.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:20:08 +0100 Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (130.246.9.202) by exchsmtp.stfc.ac.uk (130.246.236.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:19:25 +0100 Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BFB560D5; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:19:25 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4E9C396D.8010308@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:19:25 +0100 From: John Reid Reply-To: Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090908 Fedora/1.1.18-1.fc10 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , WG5 Subject: Re: WG5 letter ballot 2 on Fortran 2008 interpretations References: <20111004153447.406F03568EB@www.open-std.org> <20111004153917.DC4653568F7@www.open-std.org> <20111004160122.69DAE3568FB@www.open-std.org> <20111004162557.A588735690A@www.open-std.org> <20111004165020.0B17135690A@www.open-std.org> <4E8EC4CB.9060608@stfc.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <4E8EC4CB.9060608@stfc.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: None (EXCHHUB01.fed.cclrc.ac.uk: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Virus-Scanned: by iCritical at engine29-1277-4.icritical.com Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk WG5, > > Here is the preliminary result of the second WG5 interps ballot. However > many yes votes we get subsequently, those with the preliminary result N > are likely to be N in the final result, too, so it would be helpful if > J3 works on them next week. It was pointed out to me last week that COUNT and four other intrinsics with an optional DIM argument cannot be rewritten as a pair of overloaded procedures because calls to them might be ambiguous. I therefore wish to change my vote on F08/0038 to YES. Considering F08/0038 has made me aware of the merit of rewriting intrinsics with an optional DIM argument as a pair of overloaded procedures. I am therefore no longer opposed to the acceptance of F08/003, though I would like to suggest adding this to the ANSWER. "This is done as far as possible by rewriting each procedure as a pair of overloaded procedures, but this cannot be done for COUNT, LBOUND, LCOBOUND, UBOUND, or UCOBOND because calls to them might become ambiguous." May I remind you that the deadline is 0900 UK time on Wednesday, 19 October 2011? Cheers, John. -- Scanned by iCritical.