From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org  Tue Sep 27 19:04:49 2011
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org
Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id F33953568EB; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:04:48 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.tiscali.co.uk [212.74.100.54])
	by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E116F3568AD
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:04:46 +0200 (CEST)
X-Trace: 676057494/mk-filter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/88.104.255.7/None/d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 88.104.255.7
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk
X-SMTP-AUTH: 
X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM
X-MUA: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqoCADwBgk5YaP8H/2dsb2JhbAAMNZk5kQ4BAQEBAzgCTwtGV8IphitgBJhijCU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,450,1312153200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="676057494"
Received: from 88-104-255-7.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([88.104.255.7])
  by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2011 18:04:46 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To: <20110926174957.050073568CA@www.open-std.org>
References: <4E67354E.80801@stfc.ac.uk> <20110926174957.050073568CA@www.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <E8BB8510-8985-4DBE-920C-940BD303B2E5@bcs.org.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Muxworthy <d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk>
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.4540) Vote on second WG5 ballot on interpretations
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:05:14 +0100
To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Herewith my vote.
David Muxworthy
-----------------------------------
Yes  No Number     Title
-Y- --- F08/0021   STORAGE_SIZE and unlimited polymorphic
-Y- --- F08/0022   DO CONCURRENT and file i/o
-Y- --- F08/0023   DO CONCURRENT and POINTER
-Y- --- F08/0024   Dummy arguments of impure elemental procedures
-Y- --- F08/0025   DO CONCURRENT and ALLOCATABLE
-Y- --- F08/0026   DO CONCURRENT and output interleaving
-Y- --- F08/0027   ATOMIC_REF example
-Y- --- F08/0028   Does a procedure reference cause loop termination?
-Y- --- F08/0029   G0 edit descriptor and floating-point output
-Y- --- F08/0030   Unlimited format repeat effects
-Y- --- F08/0031   PURE INTENT(OUT) finalization
-Y- --- F08/0032   PURE FUNCTION result finalization
-Y- --- F08/0033   PURE polymorphic finalization
-Y- --- F08/0034   ELEMENTAL INTENT(OUT) finalization
-Y- --- F08/0035   Maximum value for SHIFT argument to SHIFTL
                    and SHIFTR
-C- --- F08/0036   NORM2 example in Annex C
-Y- --- F08/0037   PROCEDURE POINTER vs PROTECTED
-C- --- F08/0038   Are pointless restrictions on DIM arguments
                    intended?
-Y- --- F08/0039   Many-one vector subscript usage
-Y- --- F08/0040   MOVE_ALLOC for coarrays
-Y- --- F08/0042   SOURCE= questions
-Y- --- F08/0043   Executing a type-bound procedure on a coindexed
                    object
-Y- --- F08/0044   Resolving the type of a coarray or coindexed object
-C- --- F08/0046   VALUE attribute restrictions
-Y- --- F08/0047   public generic with same name as private type
-Y- --- F08/0049   ELEMENTAL functions with nonconstant type parameters
-Y- --- F08/0050   Ordering requirements on definition of specification
                    functions
-Y- --- F08/0051   Pure procedure arguments with VALUE
-y- --- F08/0052   Private type-bound procedures
-C- --- F08/0053   Restrictions on generic declarations, generic
                    resolution
-Y- --- F08/0054   Requirements for needing an explicit interface
--------------------------
F08/0036
The edit draws attention to the definition of NORM2.  This contains a
recommendation on computation, at [375:4], which is the only
'recommendation' in subclause 13.  Should it not be a Note, or be
omitted altogether?
--------------------------
F08/0038
Yes to the principle.  I have not checked the edits pending the outcome
of F08/0003.
--------------------------
F08/0046
The edit should be to page xv.
--------------------------
F08/0053
In the edit, the reference to (9.6.4.8.3) should immediately follow
"arguments".
--------------------------

