From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Wed Sep 21 15:22:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 3A1343568D7; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:22:38 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (e1.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.141]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C293567FC for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:22:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from /spool/local by us.ibm.com with XMail ESMTP for from ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:18:49 -0400 Received: from d01relay07.pok.ibm.com ([9.56.227.147]) by us.ibm.com ([192.168.1.101]) with XMail ESMTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:18:36 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p8LDINrO1363980 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:18:23 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p8LDIJGI008845 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:18:19 -0300 Received: from d25ml04.torolab.ibm.com (d25ml04.torolab.ibm.com [9.26.6.105]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p8LDII3r008832; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:18:18 -0300 In-Reply-To: <20110823120807.C81523568C1@www.open-std.org> References: <20110823120807.C81523568C1@www.open-std.org> To: fortran standards email list for J3 Cc: j3-bounces@j3-fortran.org, WG5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4516) WG5 ballot on interpretations X-KeepSent: 6BCBBA7F:769C1880-85257912:0048E025; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1FP5 SHF29 November 12, 2010 Message-ID: From: Jim Xia Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:18:17 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML04/25/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 09/21/2011 09:18:18, Serialize complete at 09/21/2011 09:18:18 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 004916CC85257912_=" x-cbid: 11092113-6078-0000-0000-00000105E4EB Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 004916CC85257912_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Yes No Number Title -Y- --- F03/0030 IEEE divide by zero -Y- --- F03/0048 Control edit descriptors in UDDTIO -Y- --- F03/0085 Finalizing targets of pointer or allocatable -Y- --- F03/0091 Array components cannot depend on length type parameters -Y- --- F03/0096 Can a read statement change the unit value? -Y- --- F03/0105 SIZE= specifier and UDDTIO -Y- --- F03/0110 Restoring dropped restriction on ENTRY -Y- --- F03/0121 Precise FP semantics of the REAL intrinsic -Y- --- F03/0123 Implicit typing in derived types -Y- --- F03/0124 definition is poorly defined -Y- --- F03/0128 Subobjects in namelist output -Y- --- F08/0001 Generic resolution with pointer dummy arguments -Y- --- F08/0002 Are assumed- or deferred-shape objects allowed in namelist? -Y- --- F08/0003 Is a disassociated pointer allowed as an actual DIM argument? -Y- --- F08/0004 Is TARGET argument of ASSOCIATED a pointer or nonpointer dummy? F08/0005* optional arguments and ASSOCIATED - subsumed by F08/0004 -Y- --- F08/0006 generic resolution with banned argument combinations -Y- --- F08/0007 Can zero have more than one bit sequence representation? -Y- --- F08/0008 IEEE exceptions for intrinsic functions -Y- --- F08/0009 Is ABS ever required to be the optional IEC 60559 abs? -Y- --- F08/0010 deallocating objects that are associated with other objects -Y- --- F08/0011 How many times are constructed values finalized? F08/0012* Are constants finalized? - subsumed by F08/0011 -Y- --- F08/0013 How does finalization interact with allocatable assignment? -Y- --- F08/0014 Finalizing assignment to vector-subscripted object -Y- --- F08/0015 IMPLICIT -Y- --- F08/0016 Can a vector-subscripted argument become undefined? -Y- --- F08/0017 Elemental subroutine restrictions -Y- --- F08/0018 Impure elemental restrictions -Y- --- F08/0019 Transformational Bessel functions -Y- --- F08/0020 FINDLOC and logical arguments * F08/0005 is subsumed by F08/0004 and F08/0012 is subsumed by F08/0011. Each pair of these interps must be voted on together. Jim Xia Compiler Testing IBM Toronto Lab at 8200 Warden Ave, Markham, On, L6G 1C7 905-413-3444 From: John Reid To: WG5 Date: 08/23/2011 08:08 AM Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4516) WG5 ballot on interpretations WG5, There are now 62 interpretations that have been approved by J3 and are ready for vote by WG5. They are collected in N1875, attached. Stan and I are concerned about voting on so many at once, so I am starting a 4-week ballot now on the first 31. This is N1876, attached, with the due date of 22 Sept. In two weeks time, I will start another 4-week ballot on the rest. That will mean that the results of both will be available for the October meeting of J3. I am hoping that we will be able to construct the first corrigendum to F2008 well before the end of 2011. Best wishes, John. [attachment "N1876.txt" deleted by Jim Xia/Toronto/IBM] [attachment "N1875.txt" deleted by Jim Xia/Toronto/IBM] _______________________________________________ J3 mailing list J3@j3-fortran.org http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3 --=_alternative 004916CC85257912_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Yes  No Number     Title
-Y- --- F03/0030   IEEE divide by zero
-Y- --- F03/0048   Control edit descriptors in UDDTIO
-Y- --- F03/0085   Finalizing targets of pointer or allocatable
-Y- --- F03/0091   Array components cannot depend on length type parameters
-Y- --- F03/0096   Can a read statement change the unit value?
-Y- --- F03/0105   SIZE= specifier and UDDTIO
-Y- --- F03/0110   Restoring dropped restriction on ENTRY
-Y- --- F03/0121   Precise FP semantics of the REAL intrinsic
-Y- --- F03/0123   Implicit typing in derived types
-Y- --- F03/0124   definition is poorly defined
-Y- --- F03/0128   Subobjects in namelist output
-Y- --- F08/0001   Generic resolution with pointer dummy arguments
-Y- --- F08/0002   Are assumed- or deferred-shape objects allowed in namelist?
-Y- --- F08/0003   Is a disassociated pointer allowed as an actual DIM
                   argument?
-Y- --- F08/0004   Is TARGET argument of ASSOCIATED a pointer or nonpointer
                   dummy?
        F08/0005*  optional arguments and ASSOCIATED - subsumed by F08/0004
-Y- --- F08/0006   generic resolution with banned argument combinations
-Y- --- F08/0007   Can zero have more than one bit sequence representation?
-Y- --- F08/0008   IEEE exceptions for intrinsic functions
-Y- --- F08/0009   Is ABS ever required to be the optional IEC 60559 abs?
-Y- --- F08/0010   deallocating objects that are associated with other objects
-Y- --- F08/0011   How many times are constructed values finalized?
        F08/0012*  Are constants finalized? - subsumed by F08/0011
-Y- --- F08/0013   How does finalization interact with allocatable assignment?
-Y- --- F08/0014   Finalizing assignment to vector-subscripted object
-Y- --- F08/0015   IMPLICIT
-Y- --- F08/0016   Can a vector-subscripted argument become undefined?
-Y- --- F08/0017   Elemental subroutine restrictions
-Y- --- F08/0018   Impure elemental restrictions
-Y- --- F08/0019   Transformational Bessel functions
-Y- --- F08/0020   FINDLOC and logical arguments

* F08/0005 is subsumed by F08/0004 and F08/0012 is subsumed by F08/0011.  
Each pair of these interps must be voted on together.



Jim Xia

Compiler Testing
IBM Toronto Lab at 8200 Warden Ave,
Markham, On, L6G 1C7
905-413-3444


From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Date: 08/23/2011 08:08 AM
Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4516) WG5 ballot on interpretations




WG5,

There are now 62 interpretations that have been approved by J3 and are
ready for vote by WG5. They are collected in N1875, attached.

Stan and I are concerned about voting on so many at once, so I am
starting a 4-week ballot now on the first 31. This is N1876, attached,
with the due date of 22 Sept. In two weeks time, I will start another
4-week ballot on the rest. That will mean that the results of both will
be available for the October meeting of J3. I am hoping that we will be
able to construct the first corrigendum to F2008 well before the end of
2011.

Best wishes,

John.
[attachment "N1876.txt" deleted by Jim Xia/Toronto/IBM] [attachment "N1875.txt" deleted by Jim Xia/Toronto/IBM] _______________________________________________
J3 mailing list
J3@j3-fortran.org
http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3

--=_alternative 004916CC85257912_=--