From owner-sc22wg5+sc22wg5-dom8=www.open-std.org@open-std.org Thu Jul 14 20:27:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www.open-std.org Received: by www.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 5D2283568A3; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:27:37 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com (e6.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.146]) by www.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9583568A2 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:27:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (d01relay06.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.116]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p6EI3QTs026419 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:03:26 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p6EIQHRb1536214 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:26:17 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p6EIQGHG009614 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:26:16 -0400 Received: from d25ml04.torolab.ibm.com (d25ml04.torolab.ibm.com [9.26.6.105]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p6EIQGiD009604; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:26:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110711161150.84E00356883@www.open-std.org> References: <20110711161150.84E00356883@www.open-std.org> To: fortran standards email list for J3 Cc: j3-bounces@j3-fortran.org, WG5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4489) Ballot on N1866 X-KeepSent: 805C80E1:DCDFBC1B-852578CD:00649C07; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.2FP1 SHF149 July 17, 2009 Message-ID: From: Jim Xia Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:26:15 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML04/25/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 07/14/2011 14:26:15, Serialize complete at 07/14/2011 14:26:15 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0065495E852578CD_=" Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 0065495E852578CD_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > Please answer the following question "Is N1866 ready for forwarding to SC22 > as the PDTR?" in one of these ways. > > 1) Yes. > 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes. > 3) No, for the following reasons. > 4) Abstain. > > This is an individual vote. Please send your vote to sc22wg5@open-std.org > to arrive by 9 a.m. (UK time) on July 15th 2011. My vote: abstain My concern is that introduction of assumed-type and assumed-rank dummy arguments further complicates the situation in the area of argument association. There isn't enough time to study the possible pitfalls in using these different type of arguments in complicate call chains. I certainly didn't have time to go through all the possible permutations. Cheers, Jim Xia Compiler Testing IBM Toronto Lab at 8200 Warden Ave, Markham, On, L6G 1C7 905-413-3444 --=_alternative 0065495E852578CD_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
> Please answer the following question "Is N1866 ready for forwarding to SC22
> as the PDTR?" in one of these ways.
>
> 1) Yes.
> 2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.
> 3) No, for the following reasons.
> 4) Abstain.
>
> This is an individual vote. Please send your vote to sc22wg5@open-std.org
> to arrive by 9 a.m. (UK time) on July 15th 2011.

My vote: abstain
My concern is that introduction of assumed-type and assumed-rank dummy arguments further complicates the situation in the area of argument association.  There isn't enough time to study the possible pitfalls in using these different type of arguments in complicate call chains.  I certainly didn't have time to go through all the possible permutations.

Cheers,


Jim Xia

Compiler Testing
IBM Toronto Lab at 8200 Warden Ave,
Markham, On, L6G 1C7
905-413-3444
--=_alternative 0065495E852578CD_=--