From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Thu May 5 17:11:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id E95A6C178DC; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:11:52 +0200 (CET DST) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from engine19-1277-3.icritical.com (engine19-1277-3.icritical.com [93.95.13.95]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 410ACC178DA for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 17:11:52 +0200 (CET DST) Received: (qmail 1693 invoked from network); 5 May 2011 15:11:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by engine19-1277-3.icritical.com with SMTP; 5 May 2011 15:11:55 -0000 Received: from engine19-1277-3.icritical.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (engine19-1277-3.icritical.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 01490-04 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:11:53 +0100 (BST) Received: (qmail 1679 invoked by uid 599); 5 May 2011 15:11:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO exchhub03.rl.ac.uk) (130.246.236.9) by engine19-1277-3.icritical.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:11:53 +0100 Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (130.246.9.202) by exchsmtp.stfc.ac.uk (130.246.236.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:11:48 +0100 Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD278560D5; Thu, 5 May 2011 16:11:48 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4DC2BE34.4050107@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 16:11:48 +0100 From: John Reid Reply-To: Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090908 Fedora/1.1.18-1.fc10 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WG5 Subject: Re: AW: (SC22WG5.4446) PDTR on Further Interoperability References: <20110331154109.5070CC178E4@www2.open-std.org> <20110401003328.8B70BC178DA@www2.open-std.org> <20110401132710.09AE6C178DA@www2.open-std.org> <20110404114630.48DD0C178DC@www2.open-std.org> <20110505141344.CFDE1C178DA@www2.open-std.org> <166ED263DF83324D9A3BA67FB6772B2B12423BDB@BADWLRZ-SWMBX1.ads.mwn.de> In-Reply-To: <166ED263DF83324D9A3BA67FB6772B2B12423BDB@BADWLRZ-SWMBX1.ads.mwn.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: None (EXCHHUB01.fed.cclrc.ac.uk: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Virus-Scanned: by iCritical at engine19-1277-3.icritical.com Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk Bader, Reinhold wrote: >> Unfortunately, May 1st has passed and we are not ready for a 3-week informal >> WG5 ballot (item 3). Bill and I think that we need to abandon this plan. Instead, >> Bill proposes a new plan: >> >> 1. By 13 May, Bill constructs a new draft that includes all the edits arising from >> our ballot that he believes are likely to achieve consensus. >> >> 2. The new draft is reviewed by the interop. email group until the end of May. >> >> 3. By the beginning of June, Bill constructs a draft for use as the base document >> at the Garching meeting. > > This would be the consensus draft resulting from the review in 2, I assume? Yes. > Any contentious items then would be processed in step 4 via the usual paper > submission procedure? It might be useful to somewhat extend the usual > deadline for paper submission from 2 to 1 week before the meeting. Thanks for pointing this out. Dan is try hard to stop a flood of papers being written at the last minute. I think it would be better to move steps 2 and 3 forward by a few days to make the draft available for 4 weeks before the meeting: 1. By 13 May, Bill constructs a new draft that includes all the edits arising from our ballot that he believes are likely to achieve consensus. 2. The new draft is reviewed by the interop. email group until May 26. 3. By 30 May, Bill constructs a draft for use as the base document at the Garching meeting. 4. The PDTR is constructed and approved during the meeting and the PDTR formal starts soon afterwards. Is this OK, Bill? Regards, John. -- Scanned by iCritical.