From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Fri Apr  1 15:27:09 2011
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id C9A7EC178E4; Fri,  1 Apr 2011 15:27:09 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.tiscali.co.uk [212.74.100.54])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BBFC178DA
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri,  1 Apr 2011 15:27:08 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Trace: 597700916/mk-filter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/88.104.254.148/None/d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 88.104.254.148
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk
X-SMTP-AUTH: 
X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM
X-MUA: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmICANDRlU1YaP6U/2dsb2JhbAAMmE2Wbrh8hWsEkGg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,282,1299456000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="597700916"
Received: from 88-104-254-148.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([88.104.254.148])
  by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2011 14:27:02 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To: <20110401003328.8B70BC178DA@www2.open-std.org>
References: <20110331154109.5070CC178E4@www2.open-std.org> <20110401003328.8B70BC178DA@www2.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <84299830-31DF-4371-BB76-D16A76671B0F@bcs.org.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Muxworthy <d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4432)  Processing the TR ballot
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 14:28:01 +0100
To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On 1 Apr 2011, at 01:33, malcolm@nag-j.co.jp wrote:

> We should not forward any draft as a PDTR without a positive WG5 vote.
> That has not yet been achieved.

I agree.  From the political point of view it is unfortunate that WG5  
cannot reach consensus but a PDTR ballot now is not going to solve  
the problem unless a group from a country which is already  
participating comes up with a creative solution.  That could be done  
within WG5.

David