From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Fri Apr  1 02:33:28 2011
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 54EFEC178E4; Fri,  1 Apr 2011 02:33:28 +0200 (CET DST)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 662 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 02:33:27 CET DST
Received: from ns.nag-j.co.jp (218-42-159-107.cust.bit-drive.ne.jp [218.42.159.107])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CEAC178DA
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Fri,  1 Apr 2011 02:33:27 +0200 (CET DST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=www.nag-j.co.jp ident=www-data)
	by ns.nag-j.co.jp with smtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Q5SIX-0003MD-C6; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:33:11 +0900
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 09:33:09 +0900(JST)
Message-ID: <20110401093309.957a.malcolm@nag-j.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20110331154109.5070CC178E4@www2.open-std.org>
References: <20110331154109.5070CC178E4@www2.open-std.org>
From: malcolm@nag-j.co.jp
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.4431) Processing the TR ballot
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mailer
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Bill Long wrote:
> My preference would be to create an updated draft based on the edits for 
> categories 1-5, have a subgroup review the result as a PDTR candidate, and leave 
> the comparatively small number of issues in category 6 for responses to the PDTR 
> ballot and resolution at the June meeting."

John Reid wrote:
> I want us to do this.
...
> If you strongly object to this plan, please let me know at once.

I object.

We should not forward any draft as a PDTR without a positive WG5 vote.
That has not yet been achieved.

Cheers,
-- 
.....................Malcolm.