From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Thu Jan 27 19:37:17 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 74CBEC3BA1D; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:37:17 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.100.55]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE173C178E5 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:37:15 +0100 (CET) X-Trace: 563567192/mk-filter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/88.104.241.44/None/d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 88.104.241.44 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: d.muxworthy@bcs.org.uk X-SMTP-AUTH: X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM X-MUA: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArMBAN9JQU1YaPEs/2dsb2JhbAAMllXLSIMRgj4Ej18 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,387,1291593600"; d="scan'208";a="563567192" Received: from 88-104-241-44.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([88.104.241.44]) by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2011 18:37:15 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) References: <20110127163619.CFBD5C178E5@www2.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9FC2E17E-4358-4EFF-89C5-402C69BED2B5@bcs.org.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Muxworthy Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.4398) Fwd: Draft TR on Further Interoperability of Fortran with C Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:37:31 +0000 To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk I apologize for message 4400. My information on forwarding bounced Majordomo messages is obviously deficient. There follows a more readable version of the message from John Benito which the mailserver rejected. FWIW John Benito and David Keaton have been added to the sc22wg5 whitelist. David ------------------------ Begin forwarded message To: N.M.Maclaren From: John Benito Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.4398) Fwd: Draft TR on Further Interoperability of Fortran with C Cc: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk, David Keaton , WG5 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:29:36 -0800 In-Reply-To: No one even hinted that it was an "accident"! John Benito benito@bluepilot.com T: 831-427-0528 C: 831-600-5547 On Jan 27, 2011, at 8:23 AM, N.M. Maclaren wrote: >> *From: *David Keaton > >> I've had a chance to look more closely at the Fortran/C >> interoperability TR, and I take back what I said about the >> identifiers >> ending in _t. The future library directions only reserve those if >> they >> begin with int or uint, and the TR begins them all with CFI_. >>> >> > > That was not accidental! > > The only names defined by the TR that do not start with CFI_ are the > member names of structures, and none were in any of the reserved > namespaces > of C90, C99, the draft C1X, C++98, C++ 2003 or POSIX 2001. At > least as > far as my search found. > > Regards, > Nick Maclaren. End forwarded message