From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Thu Jan 27 10:40:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 2CA3CC178E5; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:40:15 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Received: from mx1.net.stfc.ac.uk (mx1.net.stfc.ac.uk [130.246.135.223]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52972C178DA for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:40:13 +0100 (CET) X-RAL-MFrom: X-RAL-Connect: Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]) by mx1.net.stfc.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p0R9dlvn029194; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:39:49 GMT Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2B5560D5; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:39:46 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4D413D62.5090007@stfc.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:39:46 +0000 From: John Reid Reply-To: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090908 Fedora/1.1.18-1.fc10 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Benito Cc: WG5 , David Keaton Subject: Re: Fwd: Draft TR on Further Interoperability of Fortran with C References: <4D128D1D.1040908@dmk.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CCLRC-SPAM-report: -2.599 : BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 130.246.135.223 Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk John, Thanks very much to David Keaton for the comment. We take the point on adding more examples and I pleased to tell you that some more are in the pipeline right now. Best wishes, John. John Benito wrote: > John, this from one of the folks. > > John Benito > benito@bluepilot.com > T: 831-427-0528 > C: 831-600-5547 > > Begin forwarded message: > >> *From: *David Keaton > >> *Date: *December 22, 2010 3:43:25 PM PST >> *To: *John Benito > >> *Subject: **Re: Draft TR on Further Interoperability of Fortran with C* >> >> John, >> >> I've had a chance to look more closely at the Fortran/C >> interoperability TR, and I take back what I said about the identifiers >> ending in _t. The future library directions only reserve those if >> they begin with int or uint, and the TR begins them all with CFI_. >> >> It looks like they are going in a reasonable direction. I >> especially like it when they give examples so I can figure out if I >> really understand it or not. If they want to add more material and >> are trying to decide where to spend the most time, I would say adding >> more examples always helps. >> >> David >> >> On 11/10/2010 04:18 PM, David Keaton wrote: >>> John, >>> >>> I'll do a more detailed review, but the first thing I noticed is that WG >>> 14 will need to be notified of all the CFI_*_t identifiers being >>> introduced. This is something the POSIX liaison does whenever POSIX >>> wants to use a new _t identifier. >>> >>> These identifiers are new with the TR, and were not part of the earlier >>> C/Fortran interoperability provisions of Fortran 2008. >>> >>> David >> >