From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Tue Dec 7 07:33:36 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8 Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521) id 0C9B9C3BA21; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 07:33:36 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org X-Greylist: delayed 8008 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 07:33:32 CET Received: from rcsinet14.oracle.com (rcsinet14.oracle.com [148.87.113.126]) by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7B5C178DA for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 07:33:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com (rcsinet10.oracle.com [148.87.113.121]) by rcsinet14.oracle.com (Sentrion-MP-4.0.0/Sentrion-MP-4.0.0) with ESMTP id oB74K5Fp001399 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 04:20:05 GMT Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com (acsinet15.oracle.com [141.146.126.227]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id oB74K01M012816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 7 Dec 2010 04:20:02 GMT Received: from acsmt354.oracle.com (acsmt354.oracle.com [141.146.40.154]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id oB73BOvl032402; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 04:19:58 GMT Received: from abhmt015.oracle.com by acsmt353.oracle.com with ESMTP id 831587691291695595; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:19:55 -0800 Received: from [129.146.84.104] (/129.146.84.104) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:19:55 -0800 Message-ID: <4CFDB5EA.5070003@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:19:54 -0800 From: Robert Corbett Reply-To: robert.corbett@oracle.com Organization: Oracle Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060509 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk, fortran standards email list for J3 Cc: WG5 Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4350) WG5 informal ballot re Interop. TR References: <20101108175805.5B97EC178E5@www2.open-std.org> In-Reply-To: <20101108175805.5B97EC178E5@www2.open-std.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org Precedence: bulk John Reid wrote: > I am very concerned that our schedule does not allow for more serious > work to be done on the draft at the February J3 meeting. Furthermore, > N1838 is not ready for PDTR ballot - for example, it contains 14 > Unresolved Technical Issues. I therefore propose that we delay the PDTR > ballot until after the J3 meeting. I have checked with the SC22 Secretary > that we are allowed for this to be a 2-month ballot, which would mean that > the results would still be available for consideration at the June meeting > of WG5. This is my proposed shedule: > > N1838 reviewed by WG5 2010-11 > Third draft 2011-02 > WG5 ballot 2011-02 > PDTR forwarded to SC22 2011-03 > PDTR ballot initiated 2011-03 > PDTR ballot comments available 2011-05 > DTR constructed 2011-06 > DTR ballot initiated 2011-07 > DTR ballot results available 2011-10 > TR published 2011-11 > > I am starting a 4-week informal WG5 ballot on this schedule and on N1838. > Please answer these questions by 9 a.m. UK time on 7 December. > > 1. Is the above revised schedule acceptable? I do not believe that the revised schedule proposed above is achievable. I do not think agreement on the technical issues by February 2011 is likely. Robert Corbett representing Oracle America