From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Tue Dec  7 06:46:32 2010
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 97671C3BA21; Tue,  7 Dec 2010 06:46:32 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
X-Greylist: delayed 2189 seconds by postgrey-1.18 at www2.open-std.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 06:46:31 CET
Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com (mail-yx0-f175.google.com [209.85.213.175])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DDCC3BA20
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue,  7 Dec 2010 06:46:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: by yxd5 with SMTP id 5so6886695yxd.34
        for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:46:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.150.191.13 with SMTP id o13mr951919ybf.235.1291696745808;
        Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:39:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [210.235.128.97] ([210.235.128.97])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g9sm3600479yha.6.2010.12.06.20.39.03
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:39:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4CFDBA5E.4070401@edogawa-u.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:38:54 +0900
From: TAKATA Masayuki <takata@edogawa-u.ac.jp>
Organization: Edogawa University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; ja; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: (SC22WG5.4350) WG5 informal ballot re Interop. TR
References: <20101108175805.5B97EC178E5@www2.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101108175805.5B97EC178E5@www2.open-std.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

> 1. Is the above revised schedule acceptable?

Yes.

> 2. Do you have any comments on N1838?

No, except that I agree with Malcolm's (4).  Sorry but I didn't have time
to read the draft TR itself, and couldn't follow most of the discussion.

On 2010/12/06 19:31, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> (4) In the past we have always required the TR to give actual edits to
> the standard to implement the extension.  That could well be necessary
> this time around to get the required clarity as to which provisions/rules
> of F2008 will continue to apply and which ones will not.

Hope this helps.  -- Makki

-- 
Takata, Masayuki: Professor
Edogawa University, 474 Komaki, Nagareyama, Chiba 270-0198 Japan
phone:+81-4-7152-9957(direct)  fax:+81-4-7154-2490(common)
http://www.edogawa-u.ac.jp/~takata/
