From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Tue Dec  7 00:25:06 2010
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id D235AC178E4; Tue,  7 Dec 2010 00:25:06 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (mailhost.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.109])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A74C178E3
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Tue,  7 Dec 2010 00:25:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [137.79.7.57] (math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57])
	by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id oB6NP2mm004427
	(using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO)
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:25:02 -0800
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4368) [ukfortran] WG5 informal ballot	re
	Interop. TR
From: Van Snyder <Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
To: sc22wg5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
References: <20101108175805.5B97EC178E5@www2.open-std.org>
	 <20101206103130.1AE8AC178E3@www2.open-std.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101206103130.1AE8AC178E3@www2.open-std.org>
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: ALTVIREHTSTAP01.RES.AD.JPL
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-source-ip: math.jpl.nasa.gov [137.79.7.57]
x-source-sender: Van.Snyder@jpl.nasa.gov
x-spamrefid: str=0001.0A090202.4CFD69F4.00BD,ss=1,fgs=0
x-auth: Authorized
x-spamclassfication-commtouch: not spam
x-beenthere: j3@j3-fortran.org
x-mailman-version: 2.1.12
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Yes
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:25:01 -0800
Message-Id: <1291677902.8132.316.camel@math.jpl.nasa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-19.el5) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AUTH: Authorized
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 02:31 -0800, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> (4) In the past we have always required the TR to give actual edits to
> the standard to implement the extension.  That could well be necessary
> this time around to get the required clarity as to which
> provisions/rules of F2008 will continue to apply and which ones will
> not.

This is extremely valuable.  I found many of what would otherwise have
been hidden corners with subtle problems lurking in them when I
developed edits for the submodule TR.


_______________________________________________
J3 mailing list
J3@j3-fortran.org
http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3