From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Mon Dec  6 18:26:11 2010
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 083D8C3BA1C; Mon,  6 Dec 2010 18:26:11 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from smtp.cims.nyu.edu (SMTP.CIMS.NYU.EDU [128.122.49.100])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318FBC178DA
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon,  6 Dec 2010 18:26:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from donev.cims.nyu.edu (donev.cims.nyu.edu [128.122.80.20])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by smtp.cims.nyu.edu (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB6HQ9Tu026391
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:26:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4CFD1CB1.5000007@courant.nyu.edu>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:26:09 -0500
From: Aleksandar Donev <donev@courant.nyu.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4370) [ukfortran] WG5 informal ballot re	Interop.
 TR
References: <20101108175805.5B97EC178E5@www2.open-std.org>	<20101206103130.1AE8AC178E3@www2.open-std.org>	<20101206134148.834A7C178E4@www2.open-std.org> <4CFD0D53.8030501@cray.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CFD0D53.8030501@cray.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

On 12/06/10 11:20, Bill Long wrote:
> However, one of the original desires of the MPI users was to have
>
> type(*),dimension(*)
>
> map to a void * dummy parameter and have only the address passed.  I 
> think this would be an often used form. 
It may be important to also emphasize that I am not proposing changing 
that. One can still write a Fortran wrapper that has
"type(*),dimension(*)"
and call C routines that have "void*". If you only want to pass an 
address around it will work great. You have an "ignore type and kind" 
directive.

The only issue here is what happens when descriptors are brought in the 
mix. That is, the real issue is the "ignore rank" thing, which is now 
intermingled with the type because the descriptor contains TKR 
information, not just TK or just R.

Aleks

-- 
Aleksandar Donev, Assistant Professor of Mathematics
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Office: 909 Warren Weaver Hall, New York University
E-mail: donev@courant.nyu.edu
Phone: (212) 992-7315; Fax: (212) 995-4121
Mailing address: 251 Mercer St, New York, NY 10012
Web: http://cims.nyu.edu/~donev

