From owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org  Mon Dec  6 17:40:44 2010
Return-Path: <owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org>
X-Original-To: sc22wg5-dom8
Delivered-To: sc22wg5-dom8@www2.open-std.org
Received: by www2.open-std.org (Postfix, from userid 521)
	id 6CBC5C3BA1C; Mon,  6 Dec 2010 17:40:44 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Delivered-To: sc22wg5@open-std.org
Received: from mx1.net.stfc.ac.uk (mx1.net.stfc.ac.uk [130.246.135.223])
	by www2.open-std.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B308FC178E4
	for <sc22wg5@open-std.org>; Mon,  6 Dec 2010 17:40:42 +0100 (CET)
X-RAL-MFrom: <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
X-RAL-Connect: <jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202]>
Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk [130.246.9.202])
	by mx1.net.stfc.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oB6GdQJK003008;
	Mon, 6 Dec 2010 16:39:49 GMT
Received: from jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by jkr.cse.rl.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB58560D5;
	Mon,  6 Dec 2010 16:38:59 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <4CFD11A3.9030404@stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:38:59 +0000
From: John Reid <John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk>
Reply-To: John.Reid@stfc.ac.uk
Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090908 Fedora/1.1.18-1.fc10 SeaMonkey/1.1.18
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: WG5 <sc22wg5@open-std.org>
Subject: Re: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.4367) WG5 informal ballot re Interop. TR
References: <20101108175805.5B97EC178E5@www2.open-std.org>	<EC16D124-74CC-4CB2-9DFC-EC4B0FA0BFC2@bcs.org.uk>	<20101206095328.37950C178E3@www2.open-std.org> <AANLkTi=Gz6xDGafP-2W+__Cw0ukU7pV4qGQjCHevamEb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Gz6xDGafP-2W+__Cw0ukU7pV4qGQjCHevamEb@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CCLRC-SPAM-report: -2.599 : BAYES_00
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 130.246.135.223
Sender: owner-sc22wg5@open-std.org
Precedence: bulk

Rasmussen, Craig wrote:
>> May I remind everyone that the ballot has 24 hours to run? If you have
>> objections, please say now so that they can be addressed now rather than in
>> haste just before the meeting.
>>
> 
> I have assumed in my response that the only specific item we are
> balloting is the schedule.  Is the plan to have a specific ballot on
> other issues?

This is just an informal ballot. I am trying to make sure that the change of 
schedule is acceptable (the old schedule was approved in a WG5 meeting 
resolution) and expose WG5 objections to the current draft in the hope of doing 
J3 work on them before the Feb meeting of J3.

> Will we be discussing and balloting papers as they come in before the meeting?

It will be an ordinary J3 meeting with its usual procedures.

Cheers,

John.